Posted on 06/14/2007 6:16:09 AM PDT by jacknhoo
Isn’t that her blow-up doll line?
So...there's not a pro-porn amendment?
And don't give me that hate speech jazz. It is perfectly acceptable to have limits on speech if those limits are necessary for public safety, like bans on sedition, incitement to riot, yellign "Fire" in a crowded theater as a joke, etc. The fact that someone takes that clear, strict Constructionist concept and tries to make it a tool for oppression does not mean there should be no limits on speech. It means that bad people will abuse government, which is exactly what the Framers predicted.
I'm not sure. Mine got lost in the mail. :O)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.