“Marriage” is a civil union which may, but does not require, religious recognition. For example, the state can recognize a marriage that involves a divorced person, not withstanding the Catholic church’s prohibition of such a union. Marriages do not require the approval of a religious institution, just compliance with state laws. As such, the state is free to define or regulate marriage as it chooses, within the limits of the Constitution, without regard to particular religious beliefs. This is as it should be.
I hear you, but you like all the rest who do not get why it is a big deal do not understand the value of Marriage as a Christian. Please read my posts.
Marriage is symbolic.... very sacred to the Christian.
Christ and his Bride (the Church). A Marriage, union wich brings life. Very precious in symbolism and reality to the Christian Believer. You see this is what you and others do not get.
You can call it whatever you want and have the appearance of Marriage if that what you choose, but you can never have the pure, unadulterated, passion which stems from a God who loves is bride enough to give himself up for her.
What do you think the Song of Solomen is all about. Read His passion.
In this case, it was done by judicial fiat, not by the elected officials of the State. This process was an attempt by the people, through the referendum process, to redress that grievance. That was thwarted today by the elected officials (who were forced by the courts to do their constitutional duty and vote which they tried to avoid doing) who failed to put the question on the ballot despite several hundred thousand signatures from citizens.