Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saltwater into Fire (Cancer Experiment Turns Salt water in to Fuel Energy)
Glumbert.com & Philadelphia CH 3 News (via www.AntiMullah.com) ^ | 6/15/07 | CH 3 News

Posted on 06/15/2007 1:18:56 PM PDT by FARS

DIRECT VIDEO LINK plus some interesting comments below it.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: newenergy; oilreplacement
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-126 next last
This technology concept is not new but this version may become a cheap way of obtaining energy for our factories and vehicles - AND MAYBE A CANCER CURE. Great double whammy!
1 posted on 06/15/2007 1:18:58 PM PDT by FARS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FARS
This technology concept is not new but this version may become a cheap way of obtaining energy for our factories and vehicles - AND MAYBE A CANCER CURE. Great double whammy!

What's "not new" are ridiculous perpetual motion/energy schemes breathlessly covered by idiotic mainstream media without a shred of scientific knowledge.

2 posted on 06/15/2007 1:20:22 PM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FARS

Big Oil is going to sink this one with cement blocks


3 posted on 06/15/2007 1:22:15 PM PDT by Ancient Drive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FARS

Over 50 years ago my grandfather (who was an unsuccessful inventor) designed a ship that was powered by salt water where electricity was conducted by reason of reactions between two metal plates in the salt water. The problem was that, in practice, the metal plates had to be huge. Very huge. Very, very huge...


4 posted on 06/15/2007 1:24:01 PM PDT by eureka! (The 'rats have made their choice in the WOT and honest history will not be kind to them...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ancient Drive

Hopefully sinking a cancer cure might provide some extra difficulty for them.


5 posted on 06/15/2007 1:24:07 PM PDT by FARS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: eureka!

The bigger problem is one of the metal plates is eaten away in the process - that’s where the chemical energy comes from...

Nothings free.


6 posted on 06/15/2007 1:27:49 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist; All; 1035rep; 1curiousmind; 4woodenboats; 5Madman2; 68skylark; AdmSmith; airborne; ...

It takes energy to pump crude out of a well, to transport it, to refine it and to deliver it to the consumer.

With all of that taken into consideration, the cancer cure / fuel solution may end up less expensive and easier to implement without any label of perpetual machine being slappped onto it.

So there willl be a cost to generating this. More than oil costs? Doubt it. So less at the pump or in home heating costs.

What say you?


7 posted on 06/15/2007 1:29:54 PM PDT by FARS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FARS
Look up Murphy's Gas. What these guys have done is to excite the salt water into giving off both elements of water (Hydrogen and Oxygen) in gas form. Put a match to it, and you've got fire.

Problem is, you have to put far more energy into it than you will ever get out of it. Further, storing a mixture of Oxygen and Hydrogen gas in any significant amount would be criminally stupid. (Boom!)

8 posted on 06/15/2007 1:34:16 PM PDT by Restore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FARS
All it needs is a Flux Capacitor.


9 posted on 06/15/2007 1:37:01 PM PDT by Dumpster Baby ("Hope somebody finds me before the rats do .....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FARS
Okay science FREEPERS, feel free to critic, this is what this forum is about, but be kind.

I have looked into this before with other claims of water fuel. It seems this guy has figured out another way to break H2O in to HHO. I can't tell if his radio waves take more or less energy than other methods like electrolysis. But lets say the radio waves are more efficient. At the end of the day you still only have two Hydrogen molecules for potential energy (with an efficient injection of one oxygen molecule for combustion). This is compared to 18 Hydrogen molecule in octane gas. This means I need a tank on my car 9 times bigger to travel 250-300 mile on a tank of salt water.

10 posted on 06/15/2007 1:42:39 PM PDT by 11th Commandment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FARS

If this were true, it could help put some of those crazy arab states out of business.


11 posted on 06/15/2007 1:47:36 PM PDT by rbosque ("A nation which kills it's own young has no future." -- John Paul II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th Commandment
Sorry, it's not Murphy Gas, but Brown's Gas or Rhodes Gas.

Read all about it here.

But yes, the people in the video do not say that their discovery has produced more energy than was put into it. The first law of thermodynamics lives!

12 posted on 06/15/2007 1:48:30 PM PDT by Restore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: FARS

The only problem is that it takes more energy to create the conditions for the fire than is released. Congress will love it! They can put it on their list, with ethanol.


13 posted on 06/15/2007 1:49:15 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eureka!
Using a magnetohydrodynamic drive? Some marine vehicles have been made using the concept of electricity moving through a magnetic field to produce propulsion.

So, your grandfather could have been ahead of his time.

14 posted on 06/15/2007 1:49:24 PM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu ( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat? Could you freepmail?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FARS
It takes energy to pump crude out of a well, to transport it, to refine it and to deliver it to the consumer.

Yes but with crude we start with free energy. With saltwater you start with expensive electricity. Even if it were 99% efficient, you get nothing but a loss of 1% of what you started with. But you have to pay for what you started with.

15 posted on 06/15/2007 1:51:47 PM PDT by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ancient Drive
Big Oil is going to sink this one with cement blocks

Doesn't need Big Oil to sink it. Any high school physics student can easily point out the flaws.

16 posted on 06/15/2007 1:53:49 PM PDT by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dumpster Baby

Love the tin-foil hat.Does it come with a box?Gee,I wish I had one of those.


17 posted on 06/15/2007 1:57:15 PM PDT by hschliemann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Restore

I think there is an inherent problem with “volume” as I tried to point out. What you link me to I have seen before. Also I erred with a tank 9x as big because I did not account for the C molecules in gas.


18 posted on 06/15/2007 1:59:17 PM PDT by 11th Commandment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 11th Commandment

Not as a fuel.

A way to create chemically pure water from brackish water, that may have a considerable amount of pollutants as well.

The energy imput probably would exceed whatever energy was released by the recombustion of the hydrogen with the oxygen (entropy, you know), but the water vapor generated by the reuniting of the hydrogen with the oxygen is probably at least as efficient as distilling water for purification purposes.

The radio waves sound pretty similar to some highly active microwaves, and we are all familiar with microwave ovens, which act directly on the moisture in foodstuffs, and is the actual means by which the food is cooked.

So this is essentially a further extension of the physics of a microwave oven.

And I am something of a fan of Sterling-cycle engines.


19 posted on 06/15/2007 2:00:36 PM PDT by alloysteel (Choose carefully the hill you would die upon. For if you win, the view is magnificent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans

I remember a few yrs back up Northern California.Evening News some guy had his whole house running on a car battery connected to some weird device that provided energy for the whole house and charged the car battery at the same time. free energy continuously. first and last time heard of him. me thinks Big Electricity snatched up the patents and buried them so deep they reached the earth’s core.


20 posted on 06/15/2007 2:01:40 PM PDT by Ancient Drive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-126 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson