Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child
This is a little deceptive. I would make the case that for many products and/or services, the real cost is actually lower -- and in some cases MUCH lower -- in 2006 than in 1981.

IMO, what you're talking about is true, but it's more a function of productivity than deflation.

16 posted on 06/16/2007 6:12:51 AM PDT by metesky ("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: metesky
Right -- Productivity driven by advanced technology, in most of these cases. A new car, for example, costs a lot more now than it did back in 1981. But when you take into account how much more advanced today's car is, you'll find that it actually costs a lot less. A 1981 car that was equipped to 2007 standards probably would have cost about $100,000 back then.

How would you measure the TRUE inflation/deflation in a nation's economy?

17 posted on 06/16/2007 6:16:02 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson