Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ndt

No, because no one on the side of sanity believed in ‘junk’ DNA, but the evolutionary religion sure did.


24 posted on 06/16/2007 9:03:20 AM PDT by RaceBannon (Innocent until proven guilty: The Pendleton 8...down to 3..GWB, we hardly knew ye...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: RaceBannon
"No, because no one on the side of sanity believed in ‘junk’ DNA, but the evolutionary religion sure did."

The definition of Junk DNA is "a section of DNA for which there is no known function"

Unless you can specify the function of every single piece of DNA, then by definition it is unknown.

I don't think you really understand the words you are using.

I recommend reading through this overview and trying again.
29 posted on 06/16/2007 9:23:54 AM PDT by ndt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson