To: AmericaUnited
"Just like it depended on JUNK-DNA being true"
No it didn't. The very definition of Junk DNA assumes that some of it might do something.
Junk DNA is "a section of DNA for which there is no known use"
You are making edits which do not exist and turing it into "a section of DNA for which there is no known use"
17 posted on
06/16/2007 9:16:52 AM PDT by
ndt
To: ndt
Allow me to edit.
- a section of DNA for which there is no known use
should read
- a section of DNA for which there is no known function
My typo, not sciences
18 posted on
06/16/2007 9:25:34 AM PDT by
ndt
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson