Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/16/2007 5:23:11 AM PDT by Degaston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: Degaston

Mitt v. Hillary would mean another President Clinton.


2 posted on 06/16/2007 5:25:01 AM PDT by Enosh (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Degaston

If he wants to go against Hilary, he’ll need to change parties. He’s got no realistic shot at the nomination unless Guiliani steps down.


3 posted on 06/16/2007 5:29:45 AM PDT by Laptop_Ron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Degaston

This joker not only has the cart well before the horse, the cart has no wheels and the horse isn’t harnessed up.

Poor Mitt Romney hasn’t a chance at the nomination. He is about to be as crushed and outdistanced as the hapless John McCain.


4 posted on 06/16/2007 5:30:45 AM PDT by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Degaston

“Too close to call are Alabama, Indiana and South Carolina.”

Ron Paul could probably beat Hillary in Alabama.


8 posted on 06/16/2007 5:36:01 AM PDT by cdcdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Degaston

More likely I think he will be kicking Evan Bayh or Mark Warner’s arse in the VP debate. Fred Thompson will handily dispatch Hillary.


9 posted on 06/16/2007 5:36:27 AM PDT by FremontLives (If I must choose between righteousness and peace, I choose righteousness- Theodore Roosevelt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Degaston

Romney is the only Republican with a realistic chance of beating Hillary in 2008.


10 posted on 06/16/2007 5:37:11 AM PDT by bw17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Degaston

“Too close to call are Alabama, Indiana and South Carolina.”

With Hillary running? This gent is smoking something illegal.


14 posted on 06/16/2007 5:45:53 AM PDT by 2nd Bn, 11th Mar (The "P" in Democrat stands for patriotism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Degaston

“loins and sinews”?


16 posted on 06/16/2007 5:47:30 AM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Degaston
Mitt is starting to surge in these early important states precisely because he impresses voters--impresses them greatly--when they are exposed to him. Given that fact, how is it that you see his campaign collapsing?

Once America's full attention focused on the race and the voters are able to compare and contrast in real time the charismatic, articulate, upbeat, highly accomplished Romney against the leaden, dull, hectoring, lecturing, frowning, frump Hillary they are going to give Romney the win in a landslide.

Mitt is real. He's got the spark to ignite the flame. All Hillary offers is a wet, soggy horse hair blanket.

24 posted on 06/16/2007 6:08:03 AM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Degaston

Mitt vs Hillary...we will become to Socialist Republic of the USA.


27 posted on 06/16/2007 6:12:51 AM PDT by The Great RJ ("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Degaston
Mitt Romney is going very strong.

What polls are they smoking? Unless some major trend changes this will be the matchup in November 2008.

The only major trend is Fred Thompson. Romney is stagnant at best in the national polls.

36 posted on 06/16/2007 6:21:02 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Degaston

On Hillary’s coattails the Democrats gain Senate seats in Oregon, Minnesota, Georgia, New Hampshire and Maine. Republicans pick up South Dakota. Dick Durbin replaces Harry Reid as US Senate Majority Leader as Harry too proves to not have the strength in his loins and sinews to handle the 2008 political season.


37 posted on 06/16/2007 6:22:12 AM PDT by Degaston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Degaston
Too close to call are Alabama, Indiana and South Carolina.

Bob Dole carried those three states. If those states aren't in the bag, we are in serious trouble.

38 posted on 06/16/2007 6:24:01 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Degaston

A lot of these sound very dubious. Mitt only slightly ahead in states like North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Texas, and Mississippi, all of which went more than 60% for Bush in 2004? Mitt must be a lot weaker than the media wants us to believe.


39 posted on 06/16/2007 6:25:03 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Degaston
Mitt leans in ...
Hillary leans in ...

So we've got these two leaning all over the country. When do they fall?

41 posted on 06/16/2007 6:29:08 AM PDT by LantzALot (Yes, it’s my opinion. No, it’s not humble.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Degaston
Hmmmmm, Mitt's trend ain't so good. To suggest he has the inside track to the nomination is lunacy.

Republican Presidential Nomination

Polling Data
Poll Date Giuliani Thompson McCain Romney Gingrich Spread
RCP Average 06/04 - 06/12 25.7 17.9 15.1 10.7 8.0 Giuliani +7.8
American Res. Group 06/09 - 06/12 24 15 20 10 12 Giuliani +4.0
NBC/WSJ 06/08 - 06/11 29 20 14 14 -- Giuliani +9.0
Quinnipiac 06/05 - 06/11 27 15 15 10 5 Giuliani +12.0
LA Times/Bloomberg 06/07 - 06/10 27 21 12 10 9 Giuliani +6.0
Rasmussen 06/04 - 06/07 24 24 11 11 7 Tie
FOX News 06/05 - 06/06 22 13 15 10 8 Giuliani +7.0
AP-Ipsos 06/04 - 06/06 27 17 19 10 7 Giuliani +8.0
See All Republican Presidential Nomination Polling Data
Intrade Market Prices for Republican Presidential Nomination
  Giuliani McCain Thompson Romney Gingrich  
Intrade Real Time Quotes (See More Data )

42 posted on 06/16/2007 6:30:24 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Degaston
Mitt Romney is going very strong. Unless some major trend changes this will be the matchup in November 2008.

Pure bovine waste!

50 posted on 06/16/2007 6:42:57 AM PDT by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Degaston

Hillary would destroy Mitt in the general election.

Just totally destroy him.


69 posted on 06/16/2007 7:21:58 AM PDT by 2dogjoe (Have a Blessed Day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Degaston
Hillary Clinton is on a roll now. Mitt Romney is going very strong. Unless some major trend changes this will be the matchup in November 2008

That major trend is the next Reagan named Thompson. Come on. Mitt doesn't have a chance. No one trusts his flip flopping. Fred hasn't even entered and he is in second place in almost every poll and tied for first in one. Mitt is down there with McCain.
91 posted on 06/16/2007 8:12:59 AM PDT by nckerr ("The truth is bin Laden and his followers did not hijack Islam; they simply took it seriously.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Degaston
Unless some major trend changes this will be the matchup in November 2008.

It'll be Fred vs Al.
92 posted on 06/16/2007 8:14:01 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson