Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bw17
“Romney is the only Republican with a realistic chance of beating Hillary in 2008”

What do you base that on? His support for an assault weapons ban? Do you count on his liberal past to attract the RAT voters like Ghouliani is planning on?

Sorry, I can’t see how he could win.

13 posted on 06/16/2007 5:44:28 AM PDT by Beagle8U (FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super Walmart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Beagle8U

You can’t win the Presidency by just appealing to the staunchest conservatives in your own party. You have to be able to appeal to both moderates *and* your own party.

Mitt is the only candidate who both: (a) appeals to moderates (as evidenced by his ability to win in Massachusetts), and (b) has a history of governing with policies that are in alignment with conservatives.

If you ignore for one minute the things coming out of the mouths of each of the top three *declared* candidates, and instead focus on how they actually governed while holding elected office, then Mitt is easily the most conservative of the bunch (Giuliani, McCain, and Romney).

BTW—Mitt *said* the right things to get elected Governor in Massachusetts, but governed in a manner that really pizzed off the social liberals up in that state. To me, that speaks volumes about his conservative credentials.


20 posted on 06/16/2007 5:57:22 AM PDT by bw17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson