Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 3AngelaD

Why now? Because neither Republican voters nor Democrat voters want it. Opposition to the bill is in the neighborhood of 80%, which probably includes most blacks, union workers, and even legal Hispanics.

A Republican president was unable to get amnesty through a Republican congress. A Democrat president, supposing hillary is elected next year, will be unable to get it past the labor unions and the blacks without mortally offending them. Each party needs the other to blame the fallout on.

That’s why Harry Reid insisted that this is Bush’s bill, and why Bush needs Teddy Kennedy to take charge of it.

Ironically, IF WE MANAGE TO SHOOT THIS ABOMINATION DOWN, the businesses that hire illegals will be screwed, because the people are waking up to what is being done. Whether the Democrats or the Republicans win in 2008, they will be pushed very hard to enforce the law. So they need to make all these people legal NOW.

It’s now or never for both sides. Call your senators and everyone else who has any influence on this, including local politicians and newspapers.


12 posted on 06/16/2007 8:24:54 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cicero

“... the businesses that hire illegals will be screwed...” because it will harder to force us to subsidize their cheap labor.


14 posted on 06/16/2007 8:27:23 AM PDT by 3AngelaD (They screwed up their own countries so bad they had to leave, and now they're here screwing up ours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero
Each party needs the other to blame the fallout on.

Excellent analysis. Quite logical and believable.

39 posted on 06/16/2007 8:56:48 AM PDT by Verloona Ti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero

Here’s what I don’t understand: if all these cheap laborers are legalized, don’t they become subject to minimum wage laws? How does this help businesses? Of are businesses going to fire all the now-legal folks and hire the next wave of cheap illegals instead? If the latter, what are the now-legal folks going to do?


55 posted on 06/16/2007 9:50:06 AM PDT by ellery (I don't remember a constitutional amendment that gives you the right not to be identified-R.Giuliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero

bttt


94 posted on 06/16/2007 12:45:34 PM PDT by Guenevere (Duncan Hunter for President, 2008!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero
One of the best posts I've seen in a long time. The Leadership of BOTH parties wants it to pass yet neither wants the credit. Their best bet is to fully exploit Bush's status as a lame duck.

I think there is also a very personal angle for Bush : he wants lay the groundwork for his nephew George P. Bush who he nicknamed "44".

125 posted on 06/16/2007 3:37:13 PM PDT by Cyropaedia ("Virtue cannot separate itself from reality without becoming a principal of evil...".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero

According to the Rich Lowry article this week it is big business in States like Arizona who are beating this drum. We have hurt them with our propositions the past two election cycles and this abomination of a bill supercedes everything we voters have accomplished — like Voter ID, no freebies for illegals, English Only and more....


157 posted on 06/16/2007 7:51:16 PM PDT by Arizona Carolyn ( If you want on or off the pet and human food and drug ping list let me know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson