in an early post you stated
"ROFL that's more outrageous than your first post claiming Chinese have access to the source code but no Americans do."
you thought that it was so funny that someone would say that the chinese had access to the source code that you were "ROFL."
now in this post you stated
"Only as a response to Linux,"
did you JUST now found out about this or did you really think someone wouldn't call you at on that?
come GE, you know better and you usually do better.
sidenote: IMO BSD would be a good choice, it is secure and you could add some final security without having to tell anyone what they are. a perfect mix of open and closed source.
a perfect system would be electronic with a paper roll that would be viewable but not able to be removed to act as a backup.
You actually think I just found out about "shared source"? As I said, check my posting history, this is old news, it's Microsoft's response to "open source", but not near as open. What's laughable is watching the open sourcers accuse Microsoft of giving something to the Chicomms, when their open source plan is based on giving them everything. Is that not a dirty disguise or what.