Posted on 06/18/2007 11:36:00 AM PDT by Sleeping Beauty
GIRLS aged 12 are to be vaccinated against a sexually transmitted virus that causes cervical cancer under plans to be approved this week by a government committee.
The Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation is expected to recommend that all girls should be given the jab in the first year of secondary school to protect them against the human papilloma virus (HPV).
The committee, which comprises senior health specialists, is also expected to recommend a catchup campaign to vaccinate all girls aged 12-16.
The final decision about who will receive the vaccine, which costs more than £300 for a series of three doses, rests with the Department of Health. However, it is intended the programme should start in September 2008.
Ministers are known to be in favour although vaccinating girls against HPV will cost more than all the other childhood vaccinations put together. By comparison, the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine costs about £12 for two doses.
The committee believes the expense is justified. The vaccine has been shown to be effective if it is administered before girls are sexually active. If all 12-year-olds were immunised, which would cost more than £100m a year, the committee believes death rates from cervical cancer could be slashed. The virus accounts for 70% of cases of the disease.
There may, however, be concerns among parents about children being overloaded with vaccinations. Children already receive at least seven jabs by the age of 12. As with the MMR vaccine, parents would be free to decide whether their children had the HPV jab.
In America, where the jab has been introduced in several states, there has also been criticism from religious groups that the vaccines can encourage girls to have unprotected sex and that it sends out confused messages about when it is right for girls to lose their virginity.
However, Dr Syed Ahmed, a committee member, said: “Surveys show the vast majority of parents are in favour of the vaccine. I don’t think girls are thinking about cancer when they decide whether or not to have sex. They are more concerned about becoming pregnant or catching chlamydia or gonorrhoea.”
The committee also says there is little evidence of any side effects, which are far outweighed by the benefits. Cervical cancer affects about 3,000 British women each year, some of whom can be in their twenties. About 1,000 women die from the disease every year.
Last week a report by the government’s Independent Advisory Group on Sexual Health and HIV gave a warning about the explosion of sexually transmitted diseases in young people.
The report warned that teenagers are having sex at a younger age and are having a higher number of partners.
And according to a study by the United Nations International Children’s Fund, more teenagers in Britain have had sex by the age of 15 than in any other European country. The figures showed 38% of children have had sex by 15 compared with 22% in France and 16% in Spain.
Germany, France, Italy, Austria, Luxembourg and Norway have all recommended that the HPV vaccine is given to girls and young women.
The Australian government has also recommended that all girls are vaccinated from the age of 12.
I've read most of the papers on HPV vaccination published in the peer-reviewed medical literature and none show severe side-effects due to the vaccine. All we have are a handful of unverified anecdotal reports from the media but nothing like this in the scientific literature. Until we do, I'd take reports like that with a large grain of salt.
DOJ needs to reign them in before it happens again.
“and are rarely harmed by it.”
The vaccine works on genital warts in males. That’s a benefit for sure.
I think the vaccination effort would be accepted by more people if it was for boys and girls instead of just girls.
I don’t know what the initial source I read was, but I googled it and came up with this:
http://fredericksburg.com/News/FLS/2007/062007/06102007/290901
Whether it’s true or not, I don’t know.
thanks for the information.
True. I didn't write my comment carefully enough. What I meant was that HPV related cancers are very rare in males so the cost-effectiveness of vaccinating males is open to question.
I’ve seen these reports as well. Until I see verification of some kind I remain skeptical. Nothing like this was reported in clinical trials and in follow-up studies of the vaccine. As for the risk in pregnancy, the vaccine is specifically contra-indicated in pregnant women. Any woman of child-bearing age who requests the vaccine should have a pregnancy test first.
As I mentioned above, it may be easier to sell to people if it were boys and girls- then, girls would get the vaccine and be protected from a known killer.
Look at the “circle the wagons”, “protect our women” approach here when it’s targeted just at girls.
I take your point. But at $360+ for every person vaccinated that's a lot of money.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.