[Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus]

Then you must be hell on Geology, Astronomy, Physics, and so forth, and so on.

No, just the philosophical approach which misinterprets the empirical evidences obtained from those disciplines. Evolutionism just likes to add it's own spin, and then claim that these interpretations, in and of themselves, are "science". It's all bunkum, it's all circular, and it belies poor thinking abilities on the part of the evolutionists who do it.

[Non-Sequitur]

No, just the philosophical approach which misinterprets the empirical evidences obtained from those disciplines.

Major parts of all three directly contradict creationism, are purely theoretical, or cannot be duplicated. Does all that fall under the 'misinterpretation of empirical evidence' part?