Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Stultis; metmom; Alamo-Girl; hosepipe
I think my previous response on this to metmom... Well, DUH....stands.

Well that sheds a lot of light. Thanks so much. It's so nice to know that you regard our contributions to the matters under debate as founded on only "trivial," and not "modal" fallacies.

So show the freaking fallacy already, okay??? Then we can decide whether it's trivial or modal -- or nonexistent as the case may be. Do not forget: You are not the only judge here, let alone the final judge here. First, there are your debate partners, your "opponents"; and then there are the Lurkers. We basically trust to the good faith and rationality of both.

Let me wish you good night and pleasant dreams, Stultis. Hope to see you tomorrow, God willing.

392 posted on 06/25/2007 7:43:43 PM PDT by betty boop ("Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." -- A. Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 389 | View Replies ]


To: betty boop
So show the freaking fallacy already, okay???

Concluding that all creationists are Islamists, from the premise that all Islamists are creationists?

I need to show you the fallacy in that?

Is this some kind of joke? (Seriously. I don't get what you're saying. I know you see the fallacy there. So what's the point?)

394 posted on 06/25/2007 7:54:39 PM PDT by Stultis (I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 392 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson