Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: csense
The point I was trying to make was, you can't speak of space, without an inference to time, (motion) and you can't speak of time, without an inference to space (distance)

So you're saying the conclusion that something with no substance would also have no form is irrational?

517 posted on 06/26/2007 7:55:52 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 516 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic
So you're saying the conclusion that something with no substance would also have no form is irrational?

No more irrational than speaking about space without time, and time without space. Take away one, you can't have the other.

This puts an interesting philosophical spin on God's existence before (if we can even say that) creation.

What's even more interesting, is God's rebuttal to this:

I am that I am

No references to space, or time.

Truly, it is profound beyond words.

521 posted on 06/26/2007 8:30:43 PM PDT by csense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 517 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson