Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kalee

Thanks, that’s perfect. What Duke thereby did, however, is reprehensible. (Well, I’m saying so because I’m assuming Duke will take NO internal action WHATSOEVER against any of “the 88” — not, for example, requiring them to kick in any money, much less strip them of tenure and/or fire them.

My sis was Duke ‘88 and this makes it very hard for me to cheer for Duke. Had the university settled for itself only, and not covered the butts of the 88 without cost to the latter, I’d feel differently. So unjust.


29 posted on 06/22/2007 8:59:03 AM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: pogo101

I live in the Triangle area. I wouldn’t allow my son to go to Duke.

They have NEVER apologized and I doubt they ever will.
I read somewhere, maybe here on FR, that one of the 88 received some sort of promotion. Don’t have time to find the article, maybe someone else can.


30 posted on 06/22/2007 9:14:33 AM PDT by kalee (The offenses we give, we write in the dust; Those we take, we write in marble. JHuett)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson