Posted on 06/22/2007 2:02:44 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
The Senate's Republican leader says he is unsure whether he will vote for the immigration bill President Bush strongly supports, underscoring the measure's precarious status.
Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., has long called for an immigration overhaul, saying the current situation is deeply flawed. And as the Senate minority leader, McConnell is central to shepherding legislation the president wants.
But in an interview with The Associated Press on Thursday, McConnell said he would not decide how to vote on the measure until a long series of amendments are disposed of next week.
"The bill on the merits is a mixed bag," said McConnell, who had brushed aside reporters' questions on immigration Tuesday and Wednesday. "I'm not uniformly enthusiastic about it."
"At the end of the process," he said, "we're going to have to make a call as to whether this is an improvement over the status quo. I'm not ready to make that call yet."
McConnell said it is unclear whether the bill's supporters can muster the 60 votes eventually needed to allow a final roll call on the bill in the 100-member Senate. His chief goal, he said, has been to see that all Republicans are treated fairly and allowed to be heard.
"In the end, I frankly don't know whether this thing will fly or not," McConnell said. "But we will have given it our best shot."
McConnell's ambivalence has been known to colleagues, but Thursday's comments about his misgivings were especially blunt and specific.
Also on Thursday, Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, R-Texas, said she will vote against bringing the bill back to the Senate floor because it includes "amnesty provisions" for illegal immigrants. As chairman of the Republican Policy Committee, Hutchison is the party's fourth-ranking Senate leader.
The immigration issue splits the GOP leadership much as it divides the party's base.
Many business groups, hungry to fill low-wage jobs, support the bill. Many social conservatives, backed by talk show hosts, denounce it as amnesty for illegal immigrants.
The Senate bill would tighten borders and workplace enforcement, create a new guest worker program and provide pathways to legal status for most of the estimated 12 million illegal immigrants in the country. The House has yet to draft legislation.
The immigration debate has squeezed many politicians, but perhaps none more so than McConnell, a strong White House ally. Some see the legislation as Bush's last hope for a major domestic achievement, and McConnell himself has repeatedly said an immigration revision is one of the "big things" a divided government can achieve.
But most Senate Republicans thus far have refused to embrace the bill. And some party strategists think voters in 2008 will reward those who oppose giving illegal immigrants lawful status.
McConnell is "not riding two horses, he's trying to decide which horse to ride," Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., a bill supporter, said in an interview. "He has a very difficult role, with the caucus so badly split. He has a duty to represent the caucus."
McConnell has proceeded cautiously, demanding that Republican senators be allowed to offer about two dozen amendments when Democrats tried to cut off debate sooner. He has declined to pressure colleagues, letting other party members step out front to defend and push the measure.
Some Republican backers of the bill grumble that McConnell has been too tepid. But others defend his approach, saying browbeating colleagues on such an emotional topic might backfire.
"I think he and Trent are dealing with it about as well as leadership could," said Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., referring to McConnell and Senate Republican Whip Trent Lott of Mississippi.
Lott has been more outspoken in saying the bill is flawed but needed, and in criticizing those who denounce it. Conservative talk show hosts have blistered Lott in return, while leaving McConnell largely alone.
Still, the corrosive debate seems to have taken a toll on McConnell. On Tuesday and Wednesday, he refused to take reporters' questions on immigration, a rare move in the Capitol hallways for a man whose deadpan demeanor and calm, monotone voice seldom change.
Privately, some Bush allies say they wish McConnell would openly back the immigration bill. Publicly, colleagues who support the bill have placed McConnell's comments and actions in the best possible light.
"I take him at his word," said Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., noting that McConnell repeatedly has said the Senate bill is preferable to the status quo. "He has been helpful in making sure it comes back" for more amendments and votes, Graham said, referring to last week's hiatus that nearly doomed the bill.
McConnell agreed that keeping the process moving, without embracing or rejecting the bill, has been his aim. Pressuring reluctant Republicans to back the president "would be exactly the wrong way to operate on a bill of this type," he said. "It would have been counterproductive."
McConnell noted that earlier this month he voted for an unsuccessful amendment that would have eliminated so-called Z visas for immigrants who lack legal status. Bill supporters called it a killer amendment, but critics call the Z visas the key to granting amnesty to illegal immigrants.
"Substantively, there are things to like and things to not like about this bill," McConnell said.
He’s smart enough to know that 95% of the country thinks that amnesty is a terrible idea! The staffers on the hill are keeping track of pros/cons, so they know!!
Just say NO to Illegal Alien Amnesty!! Keep calling!! It’s NOT OVER!!
U.S. Senate switchboard: (202) 224-3121
U.S. House switchboard: (202) 225-3121
White House comments: (202) 456-1111
Find your House Rep.: http://www.house.gov/writerep
Find your US Senators: http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm
It doesn’t matter if he is unsure how to vote on the bill itself. This is just him trying to cover his butt. Once the cloture vote happens, and he has said that he would vote for cloture, he will vote noa dnit will pass anyway. It must be killed on the cloture vote or it will be crammed through.
Pick your future Mitch.
We already know what horse old Arlen choose to ride, and Mitch is seeing Arlen getting bucked around and thrown to the ground, soon to be trampled....maybe Mitch is just a wee bit smarter to choose his horse after the race is obviously lost by the OBL horse. Hedging his bet so to speak.
Once the cloture vote is called (GOP leader McConnell and others have said they will vote FOR cloture), they will then vote "NO" on the bill---but it will pass, anyway.........thus covering their butts.
Amnesty must be killed on the cloture vote or it will be crammed through.
If his lips are moving he’s lying.
I like the ‘toon!
Is Cheney with a 12GA next in line? he’s real good at winging with friendly fire..
Our other senator, Jim Bunning, sent me an acknowledgement yesterday, it began: "Thank you for contacting me with your concerns about the so-called compromise immigration reform bill. I agree with you, and I oppose the bill".
It's nice to know he read my e-mail and is capable of giving a direct answer to a question.
McConnell is a GW pawn, is for open borders. This is a ruse to give him cover from his Kentucky voters
I dont trust Ol’ Pickle Mouth McConnell. He will vote for amnesty
Yeah, and his constituents must love the way he CYA’s don’tcha think?
I tried to fax his office yesterday. After maybe ten attempts, over several hours where the line was endlessly busy, I finally got a ring, but it just kept ringing for several minutes and then disconnected.
That cartoon of the elephant clay pigeon is hilarious. Do you know how to see more of her cartoons?
Down here in Georgia,our senators have changed their tune.Could be they see the writing on the wall.We have been wearing their butts out over this issue.Big chicken is behind this and we are calling for a boycott.
The only thing deeply flawed about the “current situation” is that Congress and POTUS will not ENFORCE THE LAWS.
IOW: A vote for cloture is a vote to destroy America and we know it.
Grand Bargainers and your more stealthy allies, be advised you are gambling everything you have on the very bad bet that we are as stupid as you want us to be.
How stupid are you, boys?
bttt
How do you figure Arlen is being trampled ? He’s got 4 more years left of his term, he’s solidly Dim-lite so he’s unshakable on Amnesty, and he might not even run again. Are there any near-term consequences to his pro vote ? I can’t see any.
I hope you are right, however.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.