Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Hears Drivers License Language Arguments[Alabama]{English}
NBC 13 ^ | 21 June 2007 | Scott Mauldin

Posted on 06/22/2007 5:24:44 AM PDT by BGHater

A war of words played out in the state supreme court Wednesday.

There’s a legal fight was over what language should be used on Alabama driver's license exams.

Here's the issue -- state law says only English can be used for official state business, but as many as 12 languages are used on the drivers tests, according to arguments in court.

Challenging the non-English tests led to the state's high court Wednesday.

In spite of a 1990 constitutional amendment making English the official state language, multi-language testing was put back into practice, in violation of state law.

The Southeastern Legal Foundation is suing to prohibit non-English tests.

"I think it's very bad for the state of Alabama, because it's a public safety concern that we need to have people with a common language on our roads,” said Shannon Goessling of the Southeastern Legal Foundation.

Immigrant groups said the issue of non-English testing is larger than language. The Hispanic Interest Coalition of Alabama is not fighting calls for English language testing, but they argue that tests in other languages prove an educational need to teach English in immigrant communities.

"If that means we need to test people for driver's licenses in a native language, we need to be flexible...with the ultimate goal of making sure everybody does speak English,” said Isabel Rubio of the Hispanic Interest Coalition of Alabama.

The state's Supreme Court has not yet ruled on the issue of non-English driver testing.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; US: Alabama
KEYWORDS: alabama; driverslicense; english; supremecourt

1 posted on 06/22/2007 5:24:45 AM PDT by BGHater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Imagine the road signs ...


2 posted on 06/22/2007 5:26:46 AM PDT by Tarpon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
I shall never forget my first application process for a Japanese Driver's License in one of their centers on the Tozai Line in Tokyo.

My papers were in order, so I was ushered in to take a basic test (in Japanese) and view some displays on traffic safety. After paying the fee and getting my photo taken, I walked out with a Japanses Driver's License in hand.

Along the way, I encountered a very irate (probably) American woman with an attitude. She was upset that nobody at that locationr spoke English and they actually expected her to provide an interpreter if needed. I looked at her and said (in my best local accent) "This iz Japan, we speek Japaneze here."

3 posted on 06/22/2007 5:34:03 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
"If that means we need to test people for driver's licenses in a native language, we need to be flexible...with the ultimate goal of making sure everybody does speak English,”

I see. The ultimate goal is speaking English. Sometime later -- down the road a bit.

I say it means we need to test people for driver's licenses in English given that the ultimate goal is making sure everybody does speak English. This will help them reach their goal.

Besides, it happens to be the law -- in America the law is mandatory, not optional.

4 posted on 06/22/2007 5:37:36 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tarpon

Exactly. And around here we have information boards on the highways that give drivers condition notices. They are not in Spanish, BTW.


5 posted on 06/22/2007 5:49:56 AM PDT by doodad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen

You’re wrong. The law is optional but the decision to make it optional is a bureauacrat’s, not yours.


6 posted on 06/22/2007 6:04:44 AM PDT by american_ranger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
In spite of a 1990 constitutional amendment making English the official state language, multi-language testing was put back into practice, in violation of state law.

What is there for the court to even rule on, then?

7 posted on 06/22/2007 6:13:14 AM PDT by Sloth (The GOP is to DemonRats in politics as Michael Jackson is to Jeffrey Dahmer in babysitting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sloth
"In spite of a 1990 constitutional amendment making English the official state language, multi-language testing was put back into practice, in violation of state law."

"What is there for the court to even rule on, then?"

Good point. Just another sign of successful invasion by illegal aliens?

8 posted on 06/22/2007 6:21:37 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
but they argue that tests in other languages prove an educational need to teach English in immigrant communities.

BS, when good old uncle SAM sent me to Spain, I learned to speak Spanish my self.

9 posted on 06/22/2007 6:23:09 AM PDT by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: american_ranger
"The law is optional but the decision to make it optional is a bureauacrat’s"

You're wrong. The law is mandatory. Because a bureaucrat broke the law and treated it as an option doesn't make it so.

10 posted on 06/22/2007 6:36:54 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
If they're legal citizens, they should be able to understand English.

If they're legal residents, why can't they get an international driver's license from home?

And if they're here illegally, why the heck give them a license in the first place?!

11 posted on 06/22/2007 6:40:12 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sloth
"What is there for the court to even rule on, then?"

In 1996 Martha Sandoval filed a class-action lawsuit against the Department of Public Safety alleging discrimination under the 1964 Civil Rights Act. A U.S. circuit court of appeals agreed, and the state returned to driver's tests in multiple languages.

The Alabama attorney general appealed the circuit court decision to the U.S. Supreme Court. In April 2001 the Supreme Court rejected Sandoval's claims of discrimination in a five-to-four vote.

The state, however, has yet to return to English only. But you're right. This is a no-brainer.

12 posted on 06/22/2007 6:45:03 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson