Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DJ MacWoW
You're twisting the findings to serve your own purposes. The low efficacy rates you keep trumpeting are for women who already have HPV. Since vaccines are preventative, pointing out they don't work so well when someone is already sick is rather anticlimactic. On the other hand, you seem to purposefully ignore the fact that this vaccine is highly effective for women who do not have HPV.
249 posted on 06/26/2007 8:36:28 AM PDT by ahayes ("Impenetrability! That's what I say!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies ]


To: ahayes
On the other hand, you seem to purposefully ignore the fact that this vaccine is highly effective for women who do not have HPV.

I'm not the one ignoring facts.

From the CDC :Cervical cancer is an uncommon consequence of HPV in women

252 posted on 06/26/2007 8:52:18 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If you think you know what's coming next....You don't know Jack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson