Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hosepipe
Logic must be persued to observe the tactics involved.. like that..

This started over what seemed to be a fairly straighforward, logical question. Given that both dogma and observeration may be either true or false, how do we test them to make that determination?

Testing observations doesn't seem to be particularly problematic - we do it all the time.

Testing dogma seems to be a different proposition altogether. So much so that the original comparison seems to be of little no practical consequence.

507 posted on 07/02/2007 10:45:02 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 502 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic
dogma and observeration may be either true or false

Or both.

511 posted on 07/02/2007 10:48:41 AM PDT by RightWhale (It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 507 | View Replies ]

To: tacticalogic
[.. Testing observations doesn't seem to be particularly problematic - we do it all the time. ..]

Observation is obvious to the observer.. but to an observer with a different vista.. another observation may seem strange or even in error.. i.e. the Observer problem..

Whos correct?, or even more correct?, or has blind spots?..
All three could be possible with all observers(us)..

514 posted on 07/02/2007 10:57:25 AM PDT by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 507 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson