1 posted on
06/23/2007 4:51:32 PM PDT by
freedom44
To: freedom44
Can we get the time and place for this glorious event? This should really be televised and if we could just get some coordinates, I’m sure it will be very exciting.
2 posted on
06/23/2007 4:53:49 PM PDT by
BipolarBob
(Yes I backed over the vampire, but I swear I didn't see it in my rear view mirror.)
To: freedom44
3 posted on
06/23/2007 4:57:49 PM PDT by
ASA Vet
To: freedom44
Ul-Haq has stirred tensions by suggesting the knighthood could justify suicide attacks and undermine Pakistan's effort against "terrorism". On Thursday, he said he would travel to Britain soon to meet Muslim scholars and promote interfaith harmony.
That needs repeating.
To: freedom44
I’ll be the first to admit, making Saliman Rushdie a kinght was a stupid decision. He’s a trash writer, pure and simple. But that in no way justifies honoring Osama Bin Laden for anything.
5 posted on
06/23/2007 4:59:26 PM PDT by
Clintonfatigued
(Open borders and outsourcing are opposite sides of the same coin)
To: freedom44
We are ready to die for Prophet Muhammad's honour We would be happy to accommodate you.
To: freedom44
"The name means "Sword of God" and would be given to the al-Qaeda leader for "serving Muslims..." What was that Sean Connery said about bringing a GD knife to a gun fight?
8 posted on
06/23/2007 5:07:17 PM PDT by
skimbell
To: freedom44
We've got a little award for you over here, Osama.
9 posted on
06/23/2007 5:07:42 PM PDT by
AdvisorB
("A Hillary Clinton presidency will result in a weaker economy and a weaker America" Dick Morris)
To: freedom44
The name means "Sword of God" and would be given to the al-Qaeda leader for "serving Muslims by waging jihad against infidels". Ashrafi said: "If Britain can give a knighthood to Rushdie, we too have the right to make awards to our leaders and heroes." Well, turnabout IS fair play. So I guess it's only fair that the Muslims would respond to an honor to an author by honoring a murderous psychopath who dedicates his life to killing thousands of innocents in the most unspeakable ways possible.
12 posted on
06/23/2007 5:11:13 PM PDT by
Maceman
To: freedom44
***Target of Opportunity***, IMO...
To: freedom44
15 posted on
06/23/2007 5:21:08 PM PDT by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: freedom44
well isn't THAT special...
18 posted on
06/23/2007 6:48:48 PM PDT by
Chode
(American Hedonist)
To: freedom44
A gang of terrorist cult witch doctors are trying to resurrect bin Laden. There are good reasons to believe that he has been dead ever since 2004.
The Islam/Muslims world is not a monolithic body. It is scattered over half the Earth. There are no leaders except for individual tribesmen chiefs who command a small band of terrorists. Most of the “fighters” are peasants running around in ragged nightgowns shooting AK-47s in the air
The only common thread connecting the worldwide Islamic terrorists network is the Islamic religion. The leaders of these diverse gangs are aware that the movement needs a unifying name to rally around.
Bin Laden is a poor choice. He was uninspiring. He was no military leader, left no writings, was not widely known, made no public speeches, and was himself almost totally ignorant of the outside world.
I guess even a dead leader is better than no leader at all.
To: freedom44
It’s becoming clearer and clearer -— much of Pakistan will have to be destroyed...along with most of the inhabitants...
21 posted on
06/23/2007 10:48:01 PM PDT by
river rat
(Semper Fi - You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
To: freedom44
“Ashrafi said: “If Britain can give a knighthood to Rushdie, we too have the right to make awards to our leaders and heroes.”
These people are so childish and insecure, it’s laughable.
22 posted on
06/24/2007 3:03:59 AM PDT by
Mila
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson