Lott about those opposing the shamnesty bill: “...they are not maliciously trying to defeat it...”
[Well, we may be bigots (Graham) and xenophobes (Snow), but at least we aren’t acting maliciously. (Lott)]
Feinstein admits we have a ‘silent amnesty’. [Duh! Ya think? Where have you been the last 6 years, Senator Feinstein?]
F: Does believe in the fairness doctrine.
F: Touting the $4.4 billion [carrot dangling to the opposition] and "no more catch and release". [I thought Chertoff and Bush and Snow touted that catch-and-release ended early LAST YEAR.]
F: Blames the low Gallup poll opinion of Congress (14% approval) on Iraq. [The Lady is clueless.]
Lott: Blames Iraq some and immigration some and inability for bi-partisanship.
[Wallace is jumping around with his questions/topics, so it is difficult to follow the discussion.]
Wallace: Bloomberg candidacy indicates that the public is fed up with both parties. [LOL. Bloomberg's liberalism may work in big cities, but he won't do well in fly-over country.]
Lott: Says Bloomberg's run is going nowhere.
LOL. He gets one thing right.
Wallace: Bloomberg candidacy indicates that the public is fed up with both parties.
$$$$$$
Mr Wallace: Get a clue. The Bloomberg candidacy indicates that a billionaire controfreak wants to play in the White House after he leaves Gracie Mansion.
Jeeeesh! It has nothing to do with the “public”.