Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Return of Authoritarian Great Powers
Real Clear Politics ^ | June 25, 2007 | Azar Gat

Posted on 06/24/2007 9:18:58 PM PDT by gpapa

Today's global liberal democratic order faces two challenges. The first is radical Islam -- and it is the lesser of the two challenges. Although the proponents of radical Islam find liberal democracy repugnant, and the movement is often described as the new fascist threat, the societies from which it arises are generally poor and stagnant. They represent no viable alternative to modernity and pose no significant military threat to the developed world. It is mainly the potential use of weapons of mass destruction -- particularly by nonstate actors -- that makes militant Islam a menace.

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Russia
KEYWORDS: china; coldwar2; iran; russia; unitedstates

1 posted on 06/24/2007 9:18:58 PM PDT by gpapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: gpapa

very good, but he fails to mention that in WWII, the USA was the world’s largest oil producer.....maybe the deciding factor in that war in retrospect...and compare it to today and our present strategic position...now we are in the position that japan was in circa 1941. We must strike hard, fast and preemptively because we do not have the resources for a long war.


2 posted on 06/24/2007 11:45:17 PM PDT by wildcatf4f3 (Hey, this aint like the 1960s, this is like the 1860s.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gpapa
But even if China's superior growth rate persists and its GDP surpasses that of the United States by the 2020s, as is often forecast, China will still have just over one-third of the United States' wealth per capita and, hence, considerably less economic and military power.

Irrelevant. The Chicoms are already focussing their country on war production and dual-use. The U.S. will find it considerably more difficult to switch over, as it is not a command economy...even in war time nowadays. And it is given to the usual hubris of those on top...not really acknowledging the rate of ascension of those hard-charging to catch and surpass us...

The military focus of China will narrow if not eliminate the military gap that is alluded to here. They now make four times as much steel as the U.S. And Clinton and Bush allowed Magnequench to be transferred. LSIC production being transferred. Night Vision combat system production being transferred, and they have 60,000 spies here at anyone time pirating technology, burrowing into corporate heierarchy and leaching the tech... ...all win-lose shifts in production strength that don't show up as significant national security threats in peacetime...to those overconfident in the GDP as a measure of strength.

3 posted on 06/25/2007 11:39:03 AM PDT by Paul Ross (Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

FYI-Russia also has a much larger industrial capacity than the US, and can make high quality weapons at a much lower cost than the US.


4 posted on 07/11/2007 7:33:31 PM PDT by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson