Rice tried to push for Palestine now--New Talk Of Final Status Raises Old Concerns

As expected, US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has tried to capitalize on the “new reality” created by the Hamas takeover of Gaza by pushing Israel into agreeing to initiate an express track towards the creation of a Palestinian state.

The American reportedly made her move during Prime Minister Ehud Olmert’s trip to Washington last week.

According to reports in the Israeli press Sunday, Rice tried to nudge Israel into negotiating a final status solution with PA chairman Mahmoud Abbas – but then holding its implementation in abeyance until he was strengthened in his position as “Palestinian” leader.

Although Olmert is ready to help bolster Abbas, and has himself chosen to see the Hamas putsch as useful for helping restart the dead-in-the-water diplomatic process, he was not prepared to agree to what has been coined a “shelf agreement.”

For Rice – who appears to have been given President George W. Bush’s blessing to set the direction and pace of the land-for-peace process – it is increasingly important to clinch some kind of a deal between Israel and the “Palestinians” before the current administration is rendered a lame duck.

The secretary and her boss have virtually obligated themselves to tie down an agreement by the end of 2008.

Having a final status solution already signed and sealed – if not delivered – would pretty much resolve them of having to do anything more.

For Israel, however, such an agreement would constitute a second-to-final nail in the coffin as any future Israeli government would be almost required to honor what was agreed upon.

As it is, it appears highly unlikely that anything less than a massive and unmistakable effort by the Arabs to destroy Israel in a full military onslaught – one Israel would have to respond to with overwhelming might – would be able to free the Jewish state from the commitments it has already made towards giving the “Palestinians” a state

It's an old conundrum, made urgent by a sudden convergence of interests of the Bush, Olmert and Abbas administrations:

The desired destination, a two-state solution for the Israelis and Palestinians, is something almost everyone can look forward to. It's getting there that's the hard and scary part.

Jewish leaders and congressional overseers across the political spectrum were skeptical of the latest acceleration toward final-status talks between Israel and the Palestinians, precipitated by last week's takeover of the Gaza Strip by Hamas, the terrorist group.

"I don’t think anyone can force Israel to go into final status unless we see some courage from Abu Mazen," Abraham Foxman, the national director of the Anti-Defamation League, told JTA, using the popular name for Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas.

Seated in the Oval Office with President Bush smiling approvingly, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert committed on Tuesday to taking steps toward negotiating a final-status arrangement with Abbas.

Olmert said he and Bush would "talk about the groundwork that needs to be done in order to allow us rapidly to talk about the creation of a Palestinian state."

It's a dramatic shift for Olmert who, until now, has spoken of final-status issues in the abstract, but has focused on immediate concerns in his dealings with Abbas: easing conditions for Palestinians and getting Abbas to crack down on terrorism.

That changed last week after Hamas forces routed forces loyal to Abbas, a relative moderate, from the Gaza Strip.

That prompted Abbas to fire the Hamas-led government and to name a new Cabinet led by Salam Fayyad as prime minister. Fayyad is trusted in the West for the transparency he has brought to his two earlier stints as finance minister.

Cutting off Hamas paved the way for Abbas' full embrace by the West, Bush said, placing it in the broader context of his administration's backing for moderates in the region.

"I'm looking forward to sharing with the prime minister the results of a phone call I had yesterday with President Abbas," Bush said in the Oval Office, surrounded by the symbols of American democracy: paintings of Washington and Lincoln and texts chronicling the Civil War. "He is the president of all the Palestinians. He has spoken out for moderation. He is a voice that is a reasonable voice amongst the extremists in your neighborhood."

Accelerating the long-stalled peace process is not expedient just for Bush, who has barely 18 months to show results from a Middle East policy whose centerpiece is the chaos in Iraq.

Olmert, too, is bottoming out in the polls in the aftermath of a botched war against Hezbollah in Lebanon last summer and several scandals swirling around his administration. He needs a reason to keep the Labor Party in the coalition, which is led by his Kadima Party. And Abbas needs to rally Palestinians behind him after his humiliating defeat in Gaza.

Some Jewish observers wondered whether the parties fully understood what they were getting into.

"The president went overboard in his praise of Abu Mazen," Foxman said, citing the Palestinian leader's failure until now to crack down on Hamas or end rocket fire from the Gaza Strip into Israel. "He hasn't done one thing since day one to prove he's taking action to match his words."

Israel is considering releasing close to $600 million it owes to the Palestinian Authority now that Abbas has unhooked himself from Hamas. Olmert said after his meeting with Bush that he would make a decision on the money in the next few days. Some of it, he said, would go to paying Israeli utility companies that provide basic needs to Palestinian areas.

The January 2006 election of Hamas, a terrorist group that rejects Israel's existence, led much of the world to isolate the Palestinian Authority. That isolation ended this week with pledges of support from the United States and the European Union.

Condoleezza Rice, the U.S. secretary of state, said Monday that she would work with Congress to "restructure" $86 million in funds that had been earmarked for forces loyal to Abbas to confront Hamas forces in the Gaza Strip. Rice said Hamas would remain off limits for Western assistance, although she was ready to funnel $40 million to Gazans through the U.N. Relief and Works Agency.

The American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the pro-Israel lobby, is likely to closely monitor such assistance, predicating it on Abbas' continued rejection of Hamas and terrorism as well as on reforms he introduces to a government that has until now been plagued by corruption.

Olmert later said he wanted to see "administrative changes" in the Palestinian government before launching into final-status talks, referring to questions about Abbas' ability to assert control in the West Bank and control Hamas.

Speaking to reporters after meeting Bush, Olmert said he was ready to make immediate quality of life changes for the Palestinians, most having to do with easing their movement between towns in the West Bank.

The Israeli prime minister made it clear that he did not want Jewish groups or Congress to block funds for the Palestinians, which he said were necessary for Abbas to make reforms.

"The Palestinian government must get an opportunity for aid, and we must act to let it fulfill its mission of stability in Judea and Samaria," Olmert said, using the the biblical names for the West Bank, "and give services and reinforce its authority."

"It's reasonable that those partnering with us will do the same thing," and assist Abbas in asserting control, the prime minister said. Fayyad, Olmert said, was not about to transfer funds to Hamas.

Olmert was scheduled to meet with U.S. Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), the speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, and U.S. Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.), the Senate majority leader. He met with Jewish leaders earlier.

Congressional appropriators said they would closely watch how the money was spent, whatever the bonafides of Abbas's new government.

"In general, backing Abbas over Hamas, is something we ought to look at, because Hamas is a wholly owned subsidiary of Iran," Rep. Mark Kirk (R-Ill.), a veteran member of the Foreign Operations subcommittee, which oversees funding, said. "We want to make sure that if we're providing resources to the Palestinian Authority, that they are not simply used as a siphon to attack organizations."

Kirk was especially concerned about money routed to the Gaza Strip through the United Nations Relief and Works Agency, an organization he alleges has allowed money to reach terrorists. UNRWA denies the charges.

Malcolm Hoenlein, the executive vice chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, expressed concern at reports that Abbas was creating alliances with members of the Al Aqsa Martyr Brigades, a Fatah-aligned terrorist group responsible for a number of suicide attacks against Israel during the 2000-2004 intifada.

Beyond such considerations, Hoenlein said, are whether Abbas' good intentions match his skills. "The question is not the money going to him, it's the accountability, to prove what he hasn’t until now, that he is able to establish control," he said. "His troops outnumbered Hamas and they didn't do anything, so we saw the collapse there of the whole region."

Dovish supporters of Israel were also skeptical, charging the Bush administration with a pattern of forging ahead without considering the consequences.

Daniel Levy, a former adviser to Israeli governments, said the influx of money to pro-Abbas fighters may have helped precipitate the violence in Gaza.

"The most dramatic thing the money did was to encourage a Hamas pre-emptive move against Fatah in Gaza," said Levy, who is currently a fellow at the liberal Washington think tank, the New America Foundation. "Hamas saw the effort to arm up" Fatah forces and thought "we're not going to wait on the sidelines."

A senior Democratic staffer in Congress said some of the unknowns were out of Abbas' control. For instance, the staffer said, the Palestinian constitution seems to require that the Hamas-dominated legislature confirm the new government within 60 days.

"What happens then? Does this whole thing turn into a pumpkin?" said the staffer, who asked not to be identified.

Members of Congress "are going to be skeptical the administration has grasped the dynamics at hand," he said.

He noted that it was the Bush administration that pressed for early Palestinian elections in January 2006, over the objections then of Abbas and the Israeli government.

Those elections brought Hamas to power. "They didn’t understand the dynamics of Palestinian elections before setting that in motion," he said.

Asked about previous disappointments, Rice said the Fayyad-led government offered new grounds for counting on a positive outcome. "If you look at this government and particularly if you look at its prime minister, you see someone who has a reputation for integrity, who has a reputation for having accountability," she said.

Well, why the hell NOT?
Why NOT give Abu Abbas control of a state; a nation of his own to play with?
Why NOT allow them control of an economy, airport facilities, seaports, an army, a justice system, a civil service, medical facilities, and the care of the hopes and aspirations of a people?
Why NOT support them until they can grow and develop into rational and logical democratically functioning entity; ready to live “SIDE BY SIDE IN PEACE WITH THEIR NEIGHBORS”?

There are two answers to my WHY NOT questions.
1-Because history shows us that regardless of who is the Tyrant de jour, the so called Palestinians are not able to set up, organize and operate the yearly circle jerk at a Camel and Goat show.(OK. I lied about that. THAT they can do) 2-They are more interested in the failure and destruction of Israel and their hatred of Jews, than they are interested in their own success and the future of their children.

The US NEEDS not to be part of this Bullshit. Legacies are not hiding behind the rocks and dunes of a Palestinian State.

If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

High Volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel. or WOT [War on Terror]

----------------------------

rice and bush are rinos in every meaningful way

naive, elite, out-of-touch, confused

thompson truly is the man for the times

This is what always amazed me about people on here calling for Rice to run for President. Hope they have their eyes wide open right now that they don’t want any candidate that is tied to this Administration period!

WTH, Bush is doing the Jimmy Carter Billy Jeff legacy routine, enabling not one but two Terrorist governments that want to kill Israelies and Americans. We need this to end...Bush’s Legacy ain’t worth a wooden nickel and may be even worst than Carter (Iran) and BJ (alQueda/9/11!

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.