Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DCJeanGrey

I almost want them to pass it. Because I believe the current Court would strike it down pretty quickly. Can’t be sure about the future composition of the court however, and it will always be a pipe dream for leftists as long as they believe its possible.


12 posted on 06/27/2007 9:40:51 AM PDT by Blackyce (President Jacques Chirac: "As far as I'm concerned, war always means failure.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Blackyce

You emulate my thoghts..Roberts and Suypreme Court,
except the usual libs, will uphold the first amendment
so fast that the Dems ignorance would show the world what
they are all about. Good time to rule on rhis would be in Oct.’08
before the election,, and after Dems put foot in mouth
again....JK


18 posted on 06/27/2007 9:49:07 AM PDT by sanjacjake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Blackyce
I almost want them to pass it. Because I believe the current Court would strike it down pretty quickly. Can’t be sure about the future composition of the court however, and it will always be a pipe dream for leftists as long as they believe its possible.

Respectfully, no. Letting it through to pass, and be signed, in the hopes that the SCOTUS would overturn it, is EXACTLY how we got stuck with the Incumbency Protection Act of 2002. (sorry, McCain Feingold)

If these people want to talk about "fairness", how about starting with a major presidential debate that is moderated by someone other than a barking leftist (witness the 2004 debates, Lehrer, Gibson, Ifill, Schiefer [sp])?

19 posted on 06/27/2007 9:49:32 AM PDT by Christian4Bush ("Polls are for strippers and liberals." Caller to Rush, 6/5/2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson