To: GodGunsGuts
This is an incredibly weak argument against evolutionary theory that seems to be based on the word "mutation". Does anyone honestly think that a researcher who disputes the importance of mutation of cancer cells is attacking evolution?
Wow, that's weak, embarrassingly weak
29 posted on
06/28/2007 2:08:39 AM PDT by
muir_redwoods
(Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
To: muir_redwoods
It’s only “weak” because it’s narrow. A 155mm Howitzer is weak compared to a nuclear device, but it is incredibly powerful in terms of what it is designed to do. And in this case, Duesberg, without meaning to stray into the debate over Darwin, has struck an unintentional blow against the neo-Darwinist fixation on gene mutation.p>
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson