Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GodGunsGuts
This is an incredibly weak argument against evolutionary theory that seems to be based on the word "mutation". Does anyone honestly think that a researcher who disputes the importance of mutation of cancer cells is attacking evolution?

Wow, that's weak, embarrassingly weak

29 posted on 06/28/2007 2:08:39 AM PDT by muir_redwoods (Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: muir_redwoods
It’s only “weak” because it’s narrow. A 155mm Howitzer is weak compared to a nuclear device, but it is incredibly powerful in terms of what it is designed to do. And in this case, Duesberg, without meaning to stray into the debate over Darwin, has struck an unintentional blow against the neo-Darwinist fixation on gene mutation.p>
31 posted on 06/28/2007 2:45:56 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson