In fact, the first and last rationale presented for the war by the Bush administration in every formal government statement about the war was not the destruction of WMDs but the removal of Saddam Hussein, or regime change.
A fact the willfully ignorant on the Political Left have ignored so they can demagouge on the issue
1 posted on
06/29/2007 5:07:37 AM PDT by
MNJohnnie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: MNJohnnie
We went into Iraq for both strategic and tactical reasons.
The thing that we didn't think about is that there have been regional conflicts in this land for centuries that Sadham kept buried through the use of force.
What we did not anticipate was that these regional conflicts would break free in such a short time, and we didn't have a government ready to go that would put them down in a hurry.
We are there, we should not be leaving until there is a workable solution to this, and if we do leave we will be leaving a larger, and more dangerous, vacuum than when Sadham was in power.
24 posted on
06/29/2007 8:33:09 AM PDT by
Just another Joe
(Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
To: MNJohnnie
26 posted on
06/29/2007 10:24:29 AM PDT by
txradioguy
(In Memory Of My Friend 1SG Tim Millsap A Co. 70th Engineer Bn. K.I.A. 25 Apr. 2005)
To: MNJohnnie
My son is returning from Iraq on the 2nd of July. My oldest came back last year. I will always pray for the rest that are still carrying on their mission.
27 posted on
06/29/2007 10:24:49 AM PDT by
rbosque
("To educate a person in mind and not in morals is to educate a menace to society." - Teddy Roosevelt)
To: MNJohnnie
WMD and treaty violations were never the most important reason to me. Terror is used by islamofascist regimes and movements, the strongest and most incorrigible of which at the time was Saddam's. We must take down the states who use and support terror to deprive groups like AQ of their oxygen.
The treaty violations made the war perfectly legal under international law, IMHO, but were never the most important reason to go to war, or, rather fight back, since the islamofascists have been at war with us for decades.
To: pissant; Phsstpok
You two military intellectuals will love this article.
37 posted on
06/29/2007 10:57:23 AM PDT by
MNJohnnie
(If you will try being smarter, I will try being nicer.)
To: MNJohnnie
Thanks for posting this. But for,
the willfully ignorant, it is an exercise in
futility. Why? Because, in my opinion, I would
estimate the percentage of the illiterates in Dum
party is much, much higher than our Rep Party.
I would love to see a poll which breaks down illiteracy
by party.
41 posted on
06/29/2007 11:06:09 AM PDT by
cliff630
(We're here. Why & How?? Great to ponder, isn't it?)
To: MNJohnnie
Does someone have a list of the 23 whereases handy?
46 posted on
06/29/2007 11:23:53 AM PDT by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
To: MNJohnnie
Thanks for the ping, FRiend!
This is a great article and will be shared with co-workers, military and civilain alike, tomorrow.
51 posted on
06/29/2007 11:49:27 AM PDT by
Allegra
(Socks.)
To: MNJohnnie
“Why We Went to War in Iraq”
Partly because Bill Clinton and some his appointees (e.g., Kenneth Pollack, sp?)
gave out lots of reasons why we should.
56 posted on
06/29/2007 2:16:15 PM PDT by
VOA
To: MNJohnnie
Bump for weekend reading ....
57 posted on
06/29/2007 2:18:28 PM PDT by
Jackknife
( "It's not a real party 'til somebody breaks something.")
To: MNJohnnie
[.. Why We Went to War in Iraq ..]
Answer: So America would take its eyes OFF the Mexican Border.. and hamstring efforts to stop the Drug Mules from the mexican government(aka: Mexican Drug Cartels)
63 posted on
06/30/2007 11:04:49 AM PDT by
hosepipe
(CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole....)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson