Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Solar energy in space to power India
The Statesman ^ | 6/29/2007 | Stanley Theodore

Posted on 06/29/2007 5:50:52 AM PDT by Uncledave

Stanley Theodore HYDERABAD, June 28: India is working intensely on having a solar power generation station in space to meet the nation’s ever growing energy requirements.

The “hyperplane,” which needs to transport the infrastructure into space, will make a demonstrative flight at the 2008 end.

“India’s hypersonic air and space transport activity are now sharp focussed on energy production through space solar power by having solar power stations in orbit. The era of expendable launch vehicles should end and reusable launch vehicles (RLV) are needed”, Defence Research and Development Organisation’s chief controller, R&D, Mr VK Saraswath said.

On how best the scientific community and industry will meet this challenge will be the focus on the two-day conference on hypersonic technology for trans-atmospheric air and space transportation, which will be inaugurated by President Dr APJ Abdul Kalam on Friday.

Mr Saraswath said RLVs are needed to make this mission cost effective. The hypersonic technology demonstrator vehicle (HTDV) is basically a fast transport vehicle into space. DRDO is making the HTDV, while Isro is making the RLV. Interestingly, the scram jets needed for these vehicles to work are currently being tested in Hyderabad. Former chairman of Bharat Dynamic Ltd Mr Gopalaswamy, who made pioneering work in this field, is widely regarded as a “missionary” for solar energy. “The era of conventional fuels is ending. The sun’s intensity in space is nearly twice what we feel here on the Earth’s surface. On Earth, there is sunlight fit for power generation for six to eight hours a day. In space, it’s 24 hours.We need to have our own solar power station in orbit,” he said.

“Even if one per cent of our nation’s land area is utilised for solar energy, we could have nearly 1,000 giga watts of electric power. Consider this as the projected demand in 2030 is 400 GW and the current consumption is 120 GW,” he said to drive home the need to have solar power station in space. He also gave a possible collaboration scenario. For instance India, Brazil and South Africa have very good relations. They could collaborate on the technologies, infrastructure and expertise.


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: energy; renewenergy; solar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
For the ping list's wild and wacky files.

(Interesting the author didn't postulate how the power would back get to earth)

1 posted on 06/29/2007 5:50:53 AM PDT by Uncledave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RedStateRocker; Dementon; eraser2005; Calpernia; DTogo; Maelstrom; Yehuda; babble-on; ...
Renewable Energy Ping

Please Freep Mail me if you'd like on/off

2 posted on 06/29/2007 5:51:11 AM PDT by Uncledave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave
(Interesting the author didn't postulate how the power would back get to earth)


3 posted on 06/29/2007 5:53:03 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government, Benito Guilinni a short man in search of a balcony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

Microwave transmission. One catch, tho - the beam gets out of alignment with the receiving station, and you get lots of cooked stuff down below. The technology required to operate such an orbital construct is not exactly ‘off the shelf’.


4 posted on 06/29/2007 5:56:38 AM PDT by farlander (Try not to wear milk bone underwear - it's a dog eat dog financial world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

“how the power would back get to earth”

A low power density microwave beam, tuned away from the strong water peaks. The reciever is a large array of small rectifying antennas (rectenna array).

If the beam wanders off, the low power density does not cause (much) damage.

It requires a large rectenna, but if you use a very concentrated beam, the consequences of a beam steering accident goes up. Rectennas are simpler than solar cells and can be worked into building structures.

Ambitious and forward-thinking. We’ve had shuttles for how long now? And what do we do with them?


5 posted on 06/29/2007 6:06:09 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave
Oh NOT this idiocy again.

This SF has been going around since the '70's.

6 posted on 06/29/2007 6:09:26 AM PDT by Gorzaloon (Global Warming: A New Kind Of Scientology for the Rest Of Us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

If the beam wanders off, the low power density does not cause (much) damage

How much damage does it cause? Minor sunburn, toasted pop-tarts? Inquiring minds want to know.

7 posted on 06/29/2007 6:12:43 AM PDT by Sarajevo (Don't steal, the government hates the competition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Gorzaloon
Let me get this straight, India (and the rest of the Chicken Little AGW cabal) are going to fight global warming by...bypassing the protective layers of the atmosphere and directly beaming massive amounts of solar radiation(radiation that would otherwise be at least partly reflected back into outerspace) onto the planet's surface, thus generating large amounts of heat to be trapped by the natural greenhouse...I get it!

We are going to fight global warming by heating up the planet...Gee why didn't I think of that?
8 posted on 06/29/2007 6:18:09 AM PDT by Sudetenland (Never underestimate the ability of a Liberal to lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sarajevo

One man’s space-based power station is another man’s directed energy weapon.


9 posted on 06/29/2007 6:18:16 AM PDT by catman67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: farlander
Microwave transmission. One catch, tho - the beam gets out of alignment with the receiving station, and you get lots of cooked stuff down below. The technology required to operate such an orbital construct is not exactly ‘off the shelf’.

Hmmm, it could easily be turned into a weapon ( sounds like a James Bond movie ). Better not piss off Apu when talking to him on tech support. "Now Mr. American. I see on my monitor that your GPS is ......You have been berry, berry rude to me. Have a nice day !! "

10 posted on 06/29/2007 6:23:15 AM PDT by TheCipher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: catman67
One man’s space-based power station is another man’s directed energy weapon.

Exactly. Pakistan ain't gonna be happy with this.

11 posted on 06/29/2007 6:46:28 AM PDT by Uncledave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sarajevo
I don’t remember. Arthur D. Little Corp did a lot of studies about rectennas and microwaves and so forth a long time ago. They had entire generations of mice raised under a micropower microwave field to see if it caused any damage.

So if you really want to know, look for those reports. Mid 80’s, maybe? Microwave power from space, microwave power in space, should get the reports.

It’s sad to see what we had planned back then, compared to what we are doing now. Now, India, China, and Japan are all considering permanent space presence including beamed power and a permanent space infrastructure. Somewhere along the way we abandoned space.

12 posted on 06/29/2007 6:58:48 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Space ping


13 posted on 06/29/2007 7:03:20 AM PDT by indcons (Please call and thank Sens. Sessions, DeMint, and Vitter. They deserve our praise and gratitude.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sudetenland

The sunlight that the solar power satellite turns into microwaves would have fallen on Earth anyway. Thanks to losses through the conversion process, the solar power satellite actually reduces the total heat absorbed by the atmosphere somewhat.


14 posted on 06/29/2007 7:07:46 AM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

The microwave beam as contemplated would pose no danger to people or animals; its total power would be spread over many, many square kilometers of surface, reducing the microwave flux at any given location within the footprint to a small amount. One simple method of easing people’s nervousness over this non-problem would be to build the rectenna at sea, the way we build offshore windpower platforms now. The buoy-sized receiving elements could be built cheaply on land and towed to their anchor positions, then connected by underea cables to form a large array.

Good on yer India.


15 posted on 06/29/2007 7:12:50 AM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

“Now, India, China, and Japan are all considering permanent space presence including beamed power and a permanent space infrastructure.”

I say good luck to them on getting the spaceplane built and operational. It’s not impossible for them to make it work but that is a very challenging technology to implement. Should be interesting to watch.


16 posted on 06/29/2007 7:24:56 AM PDT by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan

“Good on yer India.”

Yup,I agree. We could have done this ourselves, with huge rectennas in “wasteland” areas like Nevada Test Site and NYC. We chickened out.

Funny how the Greenies protest any attempt to get out from under imported oil.


17 posted on 06/29/2007 7:26:32 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: webstersII
Our own space program was, in my opinion, greatly hampered by letting politicians get directly involved in the design and concept-of-operations.

Case in point, the Soviet shuttle was designed for remote operation and ours was deliberately designed so that an awake aware and healthy person must be at the controls for takeoff and landing. A political decision to require MANNED spaceflight.

Plus, the Soviet shuttle had far more hauling capacity because they didn’t put huge engines in the structure.

Yes, the technology is difficult but USA and CCCP showed that it can be done. You don’t need to be an American to go into space.

18 posted on 06/29/2007 7:31:50 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave
The era of expendable launch vehicles should end and reusable launch vehicles (RLV) are needed Yeah, no joke. If India can pull RLV development off, while we have not, then perhaps the 21st century will be "Asian". I'm not holding my breath.
19 posted on 06/29/2007 7:36:02 AM PDT by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

Interesting weapon potential. Reminds me of the reflective beam in Jason and the Argonauts...


20 posted on 06/29/2007 7:39:11 AM PDT by NTW64 (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson