Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 06/29/2007 9:27:15 AM PDT by Sidebar Moderator, reason:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1858346/posts



Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Appeal by Guantanamo Detainees
Fox News ^ | 29 June 07 | AP

Posted on 06/29/2007 8:56:02 AM PDT by stm

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court, reversing course, agreed Friday to review whether Guantanamo Bay detainees may go to federal court to challenge their indefinite confinement.

The action, announced without comment along with other end-of-term orders, is a setback for the Bush administration. It had argued that a new law strips courts of their jurisdiction to hear detainee cases.

In April, the court turned down an identical request, although several justices indicated they could be persuaded otherwise.

The move is highly unusual.

The court did not indicate what changed the justices' minds about considering the issue. But last week, lawyers for the detainees filed a statement from a military lawyer in which he described the inadequacy of the process the administration has put forward as an alternative to a full-blown review by civilian courts.

The White House continued to back its legal stance.

"We did not think that court review at this time was necessary, but we are confident in our legal position," said Gordon Johndroe, a spokesman for the National Security Council, said Thursday.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: enemycombatant; gitmo; scotus
There is another way to end their end there indefinite confinement. Git a rope!
1 posted on 06/29/2007 8:56:04 AM PDT by stm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: stm

my guess is that this was payback for Kennedy on the 5-4 decisions this week.


2 posted on 06/29/2007 8:59:19 AM PDT by Mercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stm

They may have decided to actually say no, instead of refusing again and again to hear the case.

Or, who knows what Kennedy will do next? The guy is way over his head.


3 posted on 06/29/2007 9:04:19 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stm

When have American POWs ever been able to contest their confinement?


4 posted on 06/29/2007 9:05:43 AM PDT by wastedyears (Cloture? Nuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

My thoughts, too. I think after the 5-4 decisions this week, five justices feel confident enough on this issue that they are going to issue a final, definitive ruling on this issue and lay it to rest once and for all.


5 posted on 06/29/2007 9:26:27 AM PDT by henkster (The dems have reserved your place on the collective farm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson