Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/30/2007 12:19:18 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: JohnHuang2
I used to enjoy shopping in Chinatown, and i also used to like to eat seafood, but i don’t do that any more. Seafood I buy and fix at home, I can determine the source,(Maybe) but in restaurants, they use the cheapest they can find, which usually means imported from China.
barbra ann
2 posted on 06/30/2007 1:39:39 AM PDT by barb-tex (Why replace the IRS with anything?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

Well, it isn’t liberalism anymore, it’s victimism; and it isn’t devoted to justice anymore, but to redress. (And sometimes cross-dress.)


4 posted on 06/30/2007 4:47:56 AM PDT by Graymatter (New legislators. No new laws. ... Let's clean house. And senate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

Justice Kennedy stated that diversity “is a compelling educational goal.”

Mr. Justice Kennedy, could you please tell me exactly what diversity is, how it is achieved and how you determine its benefit to education?


7 posted on 06/30/2007 6:40:15 AM PDT by ops33 (Retired USAF Senior Master Sergeant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

“Liberals” are the strangest, most mindless creatures on earth. They love “diversity” and despise “segregation”, but the only reason there’s racial diversity is because of segregation. In fact, the more segregation there is, the more racial diversity there will be.

For most of human history, the fact that travel was difficult allowed diverse human populations to form. Laws and customs encouraged this development, but really it was mostly due simply to logistics. A small mountain range, for example, kept the Spanish and Portuguese separated enough that they developed slightly different cultures, languages, etc. Greater distances and larger barriers, of course, led to huge differences between other groups.

This isn’t an endorsement of apartheid, just a statement of obvious fact. If everybody began mingling and mating together, the theoretical result over time would be the abolition of racial diversity. Cultures, religions, languages, and other such things would fade as the stronger or more popular ones obliterated the weaker. This won’t happen, though, because racial interests will eventually rear their heads and you instead end up with Balkanization.

Small amounts of racial diversity, such as Chinatowns and Japantowns, are a good thing. They’re exotic regions within a dominant culture. But a society obsessed with destroying its traditional dominant culture on behalf of unlimited multi-cultural diversity, and determined to use government to forcibly create a “balance” between those diverse groups, will end up either falling apart, as the Balkans and the former Soviet Union have done, or becoming a dictatorship as the only means of controlling the warring racial, religious, and cultural factions. “Liberals” would enjoy either of those results, hence their obsession with making America a multi-cultural society.


9 posted on 06/30/2007 7:39:35 AM PDT by puroresu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson