Although I don’t have a link to the Postal Mag editorial handy, in the meantime here is the analysis that Charles Tetzlaff should study for Senate Leahy. For that matter, Senator Arlen Specter, who has Leahy’s confidence, also would be fully capable of analyzing the anthrax mailings from the point of view of an experienced prosecutor.
As for Senate office staff, in light of what came out in the trial of the blind sheik’s attorney, staff should search their old emails from the 2000 and 2001 for the word “MLAT.”
As for Leahy’s chief of staff’s predisposition in June 2002, it is perfectly understandable. Everyone has their preconceptions and worldview. That’s why the dispassionate analysis of a Tetzlaff or Specter would be so helpful, provided they have time to study the matter.
I think they should make the time for an old friend.
“Why US Senator Leahy Was Targeted With Anthrax,” Scoop.nz.co, April 17, 2007
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0704/S00263.htm
I wonder why Leahy believes the FBI know where the anthrax came from?