I was wondering how you'd slither away to avoid the question. The question was:
"Why don't you explain to us how saying two people were killed by touching an envelope is a metaphor for saying they were killed by breathing in spores?"
I didn't ask if you could use "touched" as a metaphor.
But, no need to reply further. You'll just twist things again. There doesn't seem to be any way to get a straight answer out of you about anything.
If you ever feel in the mood to give a straight answer, you might try answering this question: Should we consider AFIP to be incompetent becauses they didn't report detecting polymerized glass in the Daschle anthrax?
AFIP announced that silica was the key aerosol enabling component used in the Daschle anthrax.
Your fantasies about elaborate conspiracies plotted between AFIP and the Whitehouse to falsely claim silica was present are the ravings of a madman.