Of course, you know better than the rest of the world. Hey, maybe if you write “FALSE” in even bigger, even deeper red letters someone might listen to you.
American Medical Association:
http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/category/print/6631.html\
Spores can also be COATED with an electrostatic powder so that they do not clump easily and fall to the ground quickly; these spores would then be more easily aerosolized (dispersed into the air).
Christopher Grace, MD (Univ of Vermont):
http://www.fahc.org/Healthcare_Providers/Healthcare_Providers_Contribution/Bioterrorism_Curriculum/Email_4_April_14.pdf
Anthrax spores that have been weaponized are finley milled to <5um diameter and COATED to prevent clumping.
Alan Zelicoff:
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/JFK/JohnJudge/linkscopy/3nations.html
``The amount of energy needed to disperse the spores [by merely opening an envelope] was trivial, which is virtually diagnostic of achieving the appropriate coating.’’
EDVOTEK (The Biology of Baterial Sporation):
http://www.edvotek.com/pdfs/161.pdf
The spores may also be COATED or mixed with silica.................
DuPont presonal prtotection (technical bulletin):
http://personalprotection.dupont.ca/pa_pdf/h96406techanthrax.pdf
Inhalation exposure is enhanced when anthrax spores are artificially COATED to reduce clumping.
Coulmbia University:
http://www.columbia.edu/cu/biology/courses/g4158/presentations/2004/BacillusAnthracis.ppt
Weaponizing anthrax: Basic approach is to COAT the spores with a fine silica.
http://www.forensicnetbase.com/books/2786/1660_09.pdf
Further “weaponization” can be accomplished by processing of the spores such that the tendency for individual spores to clump together is reduced and penetration deep into the distal airways is facilitated. This process results in a detectable COATING of the spore that was seen in oragnisms recovered during the 2001 attack.
The "rest of the world" is not just a few people who repeat nonsense they read in the media. It's a much bigger world than that.
Do me a favor, TR, and ask Richard Spertzel. He’s expert.
And someone who knows him should ask Steve Morse.
I asked Dr. Meselson but he didn’t respond.
Given that the patent by the guy who inherited Al-Timimi’s number involves removing the silica to permit greater concentration (avoid the weight etc.), I have no idea why Ed thinks it is probative it could not be seen.
If a current GMU grad student is following the issue, perhaps they could ask Victor M. Dr. Bailey too.
Dr. Bailey lawyered up when I just asked for Timimi’s room number.