Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bobkk47

No it wasn’t a trap because the first thing that the President said after the 2006 election when the Dems were put in charge was the fact we could now get the immigration bill passed.

Better question would be to ask why our pro-border security/anti-illegal immigration/amnesty candidates were challenged by the WH candidates and what happened to the DC funding when the anti-illegal/amnesty candidates won.

Money flowed to your race if you were pro-amnesty and money was withheld if you were anti-amnesty in a lot of races.


13 posted on 07/01/2007 5:20:22 PM PDT by PhiKapMom ( Inhofe for Senate 08 -- Broken Glass Republican -- vote out the RATs in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: PhiKapMom
My take:

Based upon Bush’s prior messages vis a vis amnesty (stated) and lack of border control (obvious), the Democrats (along with corrupt RINO's like McCain) thus seized a rare opportunity to pass legislation which would be sure to grow both government and Democrat voter rolls, at the expense of Republican party power, whose base, enraged, would punish the Republican “leadership” in 2008 in manner similar to that which they employed in 1992 (this involving another sellout Bush).

This time, if not for an unusually engaged Conservative base, they almost pulled it off.

44 posted on 07/01/2007 5:48:03 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Elections have consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson