Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SConservative

It is sane for the government to set aside an institution specifically for those who have procreative potential.

If the government realizes these folks are the source of the next, last, or future generations, then they are simply recognizing biological reality. I can see concessions and benefits to such a group.

Let’s call them the MARRIED group.


10 posted on 07/01/2007 6:53:12 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: xzins

The whole problem is marriage in not a institution of the STATE. The STATE did not institute marriage. I merely recognizes it. It pre exsisted the STATE. Now that the STATE is involved the STATE wants to say what MARRIAGE is and is not. This is something that the STATE does not have the power to do. They can pass laws all day long saying gays can marry. But they can NOT actually do so. They can only get the STATE to call their contract marriage but marriage it will never be.


11 posted on 07/01/2007 7:13:15 PM PDT by therut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson