Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush and Libby
OpinionJournal.com ^ | June 26, 2007 | Editorial Staff

Posted on 7/3/2007, 4:18:21 AM by gpapa

President Bush's commutation late yesterday afternoon of the prison sentence of I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby will at least spare his former aide from 2 1/2 years in prison. But by failing to issue a full pardon, Mr. Bush is evading responsibility for the role his Administration played in letting the Plame affair build into fiasco and, ultimately, this personal tragedy.

(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; cialeak; fiasco; libby; pardon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

1 posted on 7/3/2007, 4:18:23 AM by gpapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: gpapa
Talk about the pardon after Scooter’s done with the appeals process. I don’t think this is done yet, and better to win on appeal, politically, and likely reputation wise, than to win via pardon.

I’m really hopeful this is the plan from the White House. Then again, I’ve been disappointed before.

2 posted on 7/3/2007, 4:21:28 AM by kingu (No, I don't use sarcasm tags - it confuses people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gpapa
And the next step is to fire Fitzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

This is a great message for the judge. This was his first lesson. Now Libby should be able to concentrate on his appeal. That judge was trying to make it hard to work on an appeal by having Libby in jail.

3 posted on 7/3/2007, 4:24:29 AM by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingu

When you listen to what Bush said, it does not appear to be the plan to issue a pardon. That’s because he said that he was doing this only because it was excessive, thus he commuted the sentence. Other than that, Bush indicated the rest was justified and okay. Since he said that — now — how can he issue a pardon, when he’s saying now that it’s justified? Bush has set himself up for not issuing a pardon in the future...


4 posted on 7/3/2007, 4:25:09 AM by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gpapa

Wow. This is a total smackdown of President Bush, Sec. Rice, Sec. Powell and others. Profiles in non-courage.


5 posted on 7/3/2007, 4:32:40 AM by Huck (Soylent Green is People.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck
Man how any one can work for that outfit is beyond me. Except for his border butt-buddies , everyone else goes down the stairs. Lets hope libby wins on appeal.
6 posted on 7/3/2007, 4:37:06 AM by fantom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: fantom
Man how any one can work for that outfit is beyond me.

What outfit? The Bush admin?

7 posted on 7/3/2007, 4:38:33 AM by Huck (Soylent Green is People.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

bull hockey.....you read the front, middle, and end, and miss the squishy middle. A lotta squishy middle.

1st.Bush never says yea or nay to a pardon,in fact he speaks above it.

2nd Commuted yet deserving, you said that, the President did not. The President on purpose avoided mention of the process the processor and the jury or her verdict. He left the final of that to the final of the process.He,(the President ) has no part in that.And said so.

3td. What happened is the ability for Scooter to expose fitzgerald as a Nifong and for the same reasons.

Tim Russert and Andrea Mitchell has gas so bad right now that excuse it to guests as bad butterbeans. russert
and Mitchell lied to a grand jury and on air to America


8 posted on 7/3/2007, 4:46:54 AM by advertising guy (If computer skills named us, I'd be back-space delete.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
Other than that, Bush indicated the rest was justified and okay.

How did he indicate that? I don't recall him saying one way or the other. Just because he didn't say that it wasn't justified doesn't intidate that he thought it was.

After writing the above I read Bush's statement again.
9 posted on 7/3/2007, 5:00:47 AM by caveat emptor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: caveat emptor

Bush said —

“My decision to commute his prison sentence leaves in place a harsh punishment for Mr. Libby. The reputation he gained through his years of public service and professional work in the legal community is forever damaged. His wife and young children have also suffered immensely. He will remain on probation. The significant fines imposed by the judge will remain in effect. The consequences of his felony conviction on his former life as a lawyer, public servant, and private citizen will be long-lasting.”

Only the jail time was excessive, which indicates the rest is appropriate.

Fines will remain in effect. Consequences of felony conviction will be “long-lasting”. If Bush intends to pardon — these statements would not be true. Bush has indicated, by these statements that he has no intentionn of issuing a pardon later on.


10 posted on 7/3/2007, 5:06:02 AM by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: advertising guy

You can see post #10


11 posted on 7/3/2007, 5:07:06 AM by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: gpapa

Hooray President Bush!


12 posted on 7/3/2007, 5:15:06 AM by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gpapa

pardon him......end it


13 posted on 7/3/2007, 5:19:08 AM by Kakaze (Exterminate Islamofacism and apologize for nothing.....except not doing it sooner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

sorry, I remember you, play with others...bye bye


14 posted on 7/3/2007, 5:21:20 AM by advertising guy (If computer skills named us, I'd be back-space delete.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: everyone

Excellent editorial. Mega-dittoes.


15 posted on 7/3/2007, 5:29:17 AM by California Patriot ("That's not Charley the Tuna out there. It's Jaws." -- Richard Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: gpapa

Bush should have gone all out and issued a pardon. Does he think this half-assed measure is going to make his enemies hate him less? How can he say he respects the jury verdict when all DC juries spring from the most beknighted and lock-step-liberal jury pool in the nation, the judge is a Clinton appointee and no doubt racist and the prosecutor is an intention craving megalomaniac?


16 posted on 7/3/2007, 5:44:57 AM by Dionysius (Jingoism is no vice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: California Patriot

thx, I think........:)


17 posted on 7/3/2007, 5:48:48 AM by advertising guy (If computer skills named us, I'd be back-space delete.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kakaze

The President should have come out at the beginning and nailed Plame for allowing her position at the CIA to be used as a platform by her husband to lie about his trip to Niger in the NYT. Instead, the administration played games and threw Libby to the wolves.


18 posted on 7/3/2007, 5:49:08 AM by jess35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

I agree. Bush is trying to split the baby in two. Obviously this helps Libby, but Libby is still royally hosed and Bush seems to be done with him. For Bush loyalty appears to be a one way street.

The non-pardon/commutation is another nail in W’s coffin/legacy.


19 posted on 7/3/2007, 5:56:45 AM by Maynerd (Bush is the Herbert Hoover of border security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jess35

Played defense, and barely even that. Seems to be all they know.


20 posted on 7/3/2007, 6:07:35 AM by California Patriot ("That's not Charley the Tuna out there. It's Jaws." -- Richard Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson