Skip to comments.
Kids' pimp gets life in prison
Oakland Tribune ^
| 07/03/2007
| Josh Richman
Posted on 07/03/2007 6:26:31 PM PDT by csvset
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
repeated sex offenses against childrenThat should call for death imho.
1
posted on
07/03/2007 6:26:32 PM PDT
by
csvset
To: csvset
He’s off the streets. I’ve read too many of these child abuse cases where probation is the result of repeat offenders. I’m happy with this sentence.
2
posted on
07/03/2007 6:33:07 PM PDT
by
kinoxi
To: csvset
Just doing the pimping Americans won’t do!!!
3
posted on
07/03/2007 6:36:18 PM PDT
by
TruthConquers
(Delendae sunt publici scholae)
To: csvset
Why did his wife get off so easily. 15 months v. life?
To: SeaHawkFan
cooperated with the government, testifying against her husbandThis is my guess why.
5
posted on
07/03/2007 6:44:13 PM PDT
by
csvset
To: SeaHawkFan
Why did his wife get off so easily. 15 months v. life? Female
Females generally are sentenced more leniently than males.
6
posted on
07/03/2007 6:45:18 PM PDT
by
af_vet_1981
(Waiting for Samson)
To: SeaHawkFan
'Cause they couldn't convict him without her testimony, that's why.
If they prosecuted her, she would whine about how she was coerced, just like the kids, and a jury might feel sorry for her and let her go . . . . so they might as well get some evidence out of her.
She's still a convicted federal felon, which is no laughing matter.
7
posted on
07/03/2007 6:45:39 PM PDT
by
AnAmericanMother
((Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment)))
To: SeaHawkFan
I just noticed the 10 year age difference, too. A good lawyer would characterize her as just another victim.
8
posted on
07/03/2007 6:46:27 PM PDT
by
AnAmericanMother
((Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment)))
To: csvset
[cue “It’s Hard Out Here For A Pimp”]
9
posted on
07/03/2007 6:48:27 PM PDT
by
RichInOC
(No! BAD Rich!)
To: csvset
“..sentenced to life in federal prison without parole..”
A sentence that fits the crime.
10
posted on
07/03/2007 6:51:11 PM PDT
by
353FMG
(Michael Savage is standing on my left..)
To: 353FMG
Not Uncle Rico!
To: csvset
And since it’s a federal sentence the low-life will die in prison. They really mean “without parole.”
To: SeaHawkFan
I agree. Thats so unbalanced
13
posted on
07/03/2007 7:25:03 PM PDT
by
mylife
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
To: csvset
15
posted on
07/03/2007 9:13:13 PM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
To: csvset
A slow death at the hands of the children’s families. At least he got life. That’s more than some of these scumbags get...
16
posted on
07/03/2007 9:43:43 PM PDT
by
TheSpottedOwl
(Head Caterer for the FIRM)
To: csvset
The wife should be turned loose.
Women are allowed to murder and rape in America. That’s the rule. Maybe if she had shot one of the girls in the back with a shotgun she would need a mental evaluation before being set free... but otherwise...
< / s >
17
posted on
07/04/2007 1:38:43 AM PDT
by
Bon mots
To: AnAmericanMother
I just noticed the 10 year age difference, too. A good lawyer would characterize her as just another victim.Only works for a female; if his and her age were inverted he would still have a harsher sentence
18
posted on
07/04/2007 9:37:39 AM PDT
by
af_vet_1981
(Waiting for Samson)
To: af_vet_1981
I don't think so. If the ages were the other way around, they might have prosecuted her and she would have received a harsher sentence than she did, even in the plea bargain.
He would still have received a harsher sentence, because she turned state's evidence and he didn't. That encourages people to rat out their co-conspirators. Sometimes it's a race to the plea calendar.
19
posted on
07/04/2007 9:44:12 AM PDT
by
AnAmericanMother
((Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment)))
To: AnAmericanMother
I don't think so. If the ages were the other way around, they might have prosecuted her and she would have received a harsher sentence than she did, even in the plea bargain. He would still have received a harsher sentence, because she turned state's evidence and he didn't. That encourages people to rat out their co-conspirators. Sometimes it's a race to the plea calendar. You doubt the evidence ?
Have you not seen the numerous teacher/student molestation threads where the female teacher is (almost) always pronounced innocent by Freeper acclamation after a seductive picture is posted ?
Let's not kid ourselves here. We both know what's going on.
20
posted on
07/04/2007 12:17:12 PM PDT
by
af_vet_1981
(Waiting for Samson)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson