If the UN is going to continue to exist no matter what, might as well get a decent country like Taiwan on board.
1 posted on
07/04/2007 7:30:36 AM PDT by
jdm
To: jdm
Let’s see....who would veto this? Besides China,Russia and France,that is.
2 posted on
07/04/2007 7:35:11 AM PDT by
Gay State Conservative
("The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism."-Karl Marx)
To: jdm
Why, in the world, would an otherwise functioning adult make such a demand?
3 posted on
07/04/2007 7:35:22 AM PDT by
stevem
To: jdm
Demand “permission”
A privilege can be granted, a right is intrinsic.
The UN?...feh!
4 posted on
07/04/2007 7:35:57 AM PDT by
petro45acp
(SUPPORT/BE YOUR LOCAL SHEEPDOG! "On Sheep, Wolves, and Sheepdogs" By David Grossman)
To: jdm
Dear Taiwan: Be careful what you wish for.
6 posted on
07/04/2007 9:42:15 AM PDT by
lesser_satan
(FRED THOMPSON '08)
To: jdm
Stupidly provocative gesture. It’s not the UN that will have to defend Taiwan if China attacks. Besides UN membership is worth less than a warm bucket of spit.
7 posted on
07/04/2007 11:10:17 AM PDT by
Zhang Fei
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson