Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Senate Poised to Decide Future of Mexico City Policy
LifeSiteNews.com ^ | July 4, 2007 | Peter J. Smith

Posted on 07/04/2007 6:30:07 PM PDT by monomaniac

WASHINGTON, D.C., July 4, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) – The United States Senate will soon vote on a bill that significantly undermines the current ban on providing funds to groups that directly support abortion.

Last Thursday the Senate Appropriations Committee approved a $34.2 billion 2008 foreign aid spending bill that includes $461 million for “family planning and reproductive health programs”. The bill resembles the one passed by the House of Representatives in June (HR 2764) that would provide US donated contraceptives, not funds, to overseas groups that promote abortion among indigent people.

Pro-life advocates accuse the bill of essentially overturning the US “Mexico City” policy begun by President Reagan in 1984 that prohibits any US foreign aid to groups that promote abortion in other countries. President Bush resurrected the policy in 2001 immediately upon taking office from President Bill Clinton, who had rescinded it at the beginning of his eight year term.

Rep. Nita Lowey (D-NY), one of the House bill’s main architects, had originally drafted the legislation to provide funds for groups that promote abortion as long as they used some of it for contraception. After intense opposition, she crafted the bill so that the overseas groups would receive aid via donated US contraceptives.

However, according to pro-life Congressmen, donating contraceptives as aid would free up pro-abortion organization resources, allowing them to aggressively promote abortion in poorer countries.

“This bill represents an unconscionable policy reversal that dramatically weakens current pro-life policies,” said Republican minority leader John Boehner (R-OH). “I look forward to the President’s veto.”

Pro-life Reps. Chris Smith (R-NJ) and Bart Stupak (D-MI) offered their own pro-life amendment that would keep the Mexico City policy intact by prohibiting any US support for these groups, but it was narrowly defeated by 218-205.

The legislation is expected to have a more difficult time passing the Senate, where the Democrat majority holds control by one seat.

President Bush nevertheless has vowed he will veto any legislation intended to weaken federal policies or laws on abortion, including any proposal that would "allow taxpayer dollars to be used for the destruction of human life."


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: abortion; congress; prolife; senate

1 posted on 07/04/2007 6:30:09 PM PDT by monomaniac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: monomaniac
a $34.2 billion 2008 foreign aid spending bill that includes $461 million for “family planning and reproductive health programs

461 million. That could buy a few miles of fence, right? Oh wait, it's already paid for but they are building it a 22 miles per YEAR!

2 posted on 07/04/2007 6:34:02 PM PDT by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac

I think that President Bush can be relied on to veto such a bill. He has been strong and consistent on this issue.


3 posted on 07/04/2007 6:36:18 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Cicero, after that abominable campaign finance bill he signed into law a few years ago, I don’t think it’s possible to predict what the President will or won’t veto.


4 posted on 07/04/2007 6:43:48 PM PDT by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ken522

Nothing in life is certain, and I admit that the President has given us other reasons to doubt him. But he has been reliable every time on life issues, at least.

He reinstated Reagan’s Mexico City policy by Executive Order on his first day in office, which must have been a conscious repudiation of clinton’s first day in office, when he did the opposite.

He vetoed the fetal stem cell bill just recently, as well.


5 posted on 07/04/2007 6:51:31 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac

A much better use for my tax dollars would be to purchase arms and ammunition for use in a REAL revolution in the Third-World. Let the illegal aliens go back home with the tools to clean out the vermin who oppress the people and keep them locked into a Medieval way of life.


6 posted on 07/04/2007 6:58:55 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: Politicalmom

It’s basically the same article as my previous ping. Congress Critter ping!


8 posted on 07/04/2007 7:20:02 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson