Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Past Your Eyes; CindyDawg

Yes, he is due his day in court, but you’ve got to admit this ruling is ludicrous!

“Eventually, he said, he would like to get a stable job and live with the boy.”

He’s delusional, but he wants the kid. I can see where he thinks the kid will be his “salvation,” but he’s obviously clueless to the fact that change needs to come from within. And we can all smell the ACLU lawyer at twenty paces right behind this guy. *ROLLEYES* Can’t his “salvation” be the fact that he, for ONCE, did the RIGHT THING in his life? Why would his salvation need to lead to the destruction of yet another life? Hasn’t he damaged enough lives through distributing drugs?

A woman-beating coke manufacturer/distributor. Hard spots to change, but I GUESS it can be done. *SHRUG* Even the harlot that gave birth to him was willing to give up custody of the child...though the article doesn’t say what her particular situation ended up being. She could be in prison too for all we know.

By the time he gets out of prison, this kid will be FIVE. He’s had a stable home plus incredible medical odds to overcome and this man is NOTHING to him but some genetic material. I hate to see the courts even HINT at the fact that this guy would even have access to this child who is a total stranger that merely (and obviously accidentally because there were three “Daddies” to choose from) carries his DNA!

Sorry. I’m fierce on this topic. I’m a Step-Mom and if ANYONE came between me and MY cubs, they’d be in for one helluva whoopin’. I’ve given them a much better life than their drug-addled Mama ever wanted to.

I’m for the best interest of the kids 100% in these cases. :)


8 posted on 07/05/2007 5:38:49 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Diana in Wisconsin

I also am glad your little one have you. I can’t see any court giving him custody. Supervised visitation rights, might be appropriate though.


9 posted on 07/05/2007 6:19:40 PM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
I’m for the best interest of the kids 100% in these cases. :)

Me too. I also think they should not give parental rights or responsibilities to the fathers of illegitimate children, while at the same time the rights of married fathers should be supported and enforced more by the courts.

If unmarried women couldn't get child support they'd get pregnant far less often and opt for adoption far more often.

11 posted on 07/05/2007 10:06:06 PM PDT by Valpal1 (Social vs fiscal conservatism? Sorry, I'm not voting my wallet over the broken bodies of the innocen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson