I'm not sure I follow -- if the evidence was there to convict, the jury would have convicted him. You want this fellow to be [punished for raping the 17 year old, even though a jury found him not guilty of raping her? If you don't trust juries to establish facts, why have them at all?
Have you read ANYTHING about this? The jury found her semi-conscious state to be awake enough to say “No”. However, one of the 6 was found guilty of illegal imprisonment for locking the 17 yr old in the bathroom.