Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DJ MacWoW

If he were 25 or 30 it would be a different case, but he was only 17. In most states he would still be under the age of consent. The sentence I feel was over kill, as does the judge who overturned the sentence.


61 posted on 07/05/2007 8:00:59 PM PDT by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: John D
16 is the age of consent. So you approve of judicial activism as long as it agrees with your view.

The other men took the plea deals. Wilson chose a trial and was convicted. The sentence was mandatory. AGAIN, even after conviction, he was offered a plea deal. He REFUSES. He wants to be declared innocent even though a jury found him guilty. Until he pleads guilty, he'll stay where he is. It's up to him.

63 posted on 07/05/2007 8:05:30 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: John D

“If he were 25 or 30 it would be a different case, but he was only 17. In most states he would still be under the age of consent. “

I think you’re just throwing that out hoping nobody’s going to call you on it. If you check I think you’ll find that the age of legal consent in most states is 16.


90 posted on 07/05/2007 11:22:49 PM PDT by RavenATB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson