Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sex and the mad Mullahs
Edmonton Sun ^ | 2007-07-06 | Lyn Cockburn

Posted on 07/06/2007 3:34:28 AM PDT by Clive

he ordinary Iranian is not insane. It's the political leaders in Tehran who are nuts.

I have proof. Of both. Over the past few years, I've taught English to quite a number of new Canadians from Iran. They were all determined to learn English as fast as possible, get jobs in their chosen fields and find out as much as they could about sexual habits prohibited by the Mullahs.

"What is this awful sex I keep hearing about," asked a 40-ish man one day. Turned out he was inquiring about oral sex, something I declined to explain to him. Somehow, I think he and his wife may now be doing that awful stuff.

Turns out the Tehran Mullahs preach the one-position-for-procreation theory of sex, with strict limitations. One of them mused not too long ago that it might be all right if married people see each other naked, but it's much better if they have sexual relations in the dark, preferably with as little skin available as possible.

Another man, an avid swimmer, remarked that one of the many reasons he was glad to be in Canada was that he could swim with his wife and two daughters, something he had never done before.

And one woman, a doctor, said she knew it wouldn't be easy to get her medical licence in Canada and would take any job for now. "I'll drive a bus," she said.

My students were funny, sometimes outrageous, hardworking and open to new ways of living. What they weren't is radical or extreme.

The same cannot be said for those aged Mullahs, nutbar President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and their sycophantic puppets.

For example, earlier this week, Delaram Ali, a young woman of 24, was sentenced to nearly three years in prison and 10 lashes for attending a women's rights rally - which, of course, was banned. She is one of four women, so far, to be convicted over this protest in which some 70 people were arrested.

In Iran, a woman's testimony is only worth half that of a man's and property rights are almost non-existent. These are but two of the many injustices perpetrated against women.

Officially, the Iranian government insists it does not discriminate against women because its laws are based on the Islamic sharia code. Surely, that wouldn't be the same sharia code that was, mercifully briefly, considered in Ontario in 2004 to settle family matters. Obviously, not all nutbars live in Tehran.

In the ongoing controversy over women's rights in Iran, nothing is more volatile than the fuss over "unIslamic dress."

In April, the Mullahs authorized a "bad hijab" crackdown during which thousands of young women were stopped on the streets or pulled off buses. Some were issued a warning and some were arrested.

Their crime? A headscarf worn so that their hair could show.

And speaking of buses, Iranian women must ride at the back of the bus. This symbol of the fight for civil rights is probably not familiar to the idiots in Tehran.

Just as the irony of the hijab controversy is lost on those good citizens of Quebec who insist Muslim women and girls must remove their headscarfs. Take it off! No, put it back on! Not until Iranian women, and Muslim women everywhere, can dress as they please, with or without the hijab, speak as they please, act and work as they please, will there be equality.

Unfortunately, those crazy old men in Tehran have dampened the spirit of many young women.

"I can't do anything. I just try not to let them hurt me," said one young woman, too afraid to give her name.

Perhaps she feared 10 lashes or worse for speaking up.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 07/06/2007 3:34:29 AM PDT by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child; albertabound; AntiKev; backhoe; Byron_the_Aussie; Cannoneer No. 4; ...

-


2 posted on 07/06/2007 3:35:16 AM PDT by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clive

I think the entire sharia code is based on the Muslim male’s insecurity and collective guilt.


3 posted on 07/06/2007 4:08:02 AM PDT by mosaicwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clive
canuck dolt.

They're there to set up sleeper cells until they're ready to sneak across the border and carry out terrorist attacks against the U.S.

4 posted on 07/06/2007 4:22:08 AM PDT by DocH (RINO-rudy for BRONX Dog Catcher 2008!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mosaicwolf
I think the entire sharia code is based on the Muslim male’s insecurity and collective guilt.

One can only marvel at how the twisted the entire Enterprise is when it comes to women and sex. Here we have been given this marvelous gift of two sexes, and what to these morons do? Stone to death any woman actually enjoying the gift in any meaniningful way. Nothing says impotence and inadequacy quite like a Muslim male.

5 posted on 07/06/2007 4:24:52 AM PDT by Minn (Here is a realistic picture of the prophet: ----> ([: {()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Clive

Oh, Lyn! You’re so 20th century! Those crazy old men in Tehran will be ruling Western Europe in a matter of decades and are eyeing Canada right now. Get your head out of the sand!


6 posted on 07/06/2007 4:56:57 AM PDT by Savage Beast (Ignore the will of the people at your peril, Political "Aristocrats"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Minn
Deep down, the Muzzies are afraid of womenfolk.
7 posted on 07/06/2007 6:42:16 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Clive

I would say this fellow probably doesn’t have a good sample with which to work.


8 posted on 07/06/2007 9:27:36 AM PDT by Little Ray (Rudy Guiliani: If his wives can't trust him, why should we?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Minn

The MSMedia headlines are covering this sexist outrage against Muslim women even as we speak.

Women’s liberation movements are marching on the U.N.

Etc, etc.

Right? Right?


9 posted on 07/06/2007 9:57:04 AM PDT by OldArmy52 (Bush's Legacy: 100 million new Dem voters in next 20 yrs via the 2007 Amnesty Act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Minn
My old tagline,

Bacon is the only thing that keeps me sane

has been replaced by a new and improved tagline. Thank you for providing it.

10 posted on 07/06/2007 1:25:57 PM PDT by -=SoylentSquirrel=- (Nothing says impotence and inadequacy quite like a Muslim male)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: -=SoylentSquirrel=-

Wow. I’m honored.


11 posted on 07/07/2007 6:17:04 PM PDT by Minn (Here is a realistic picture of the prophet: ----> ([: {()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson