Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coloradans Aim to Exploit Hole in 'Roe'(We can only hope & pray!)
worldnetdaily.com ^ | July 6, 2007 | staff

Posted on 07/06/2007 7:24:11 PM PDT by kellynla

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: Controlling Legal Authority
Missouri did this a long time ago.

Actually, what you cited is different from what is being reported for Colorado. IANAL, but I think it's obvious that defining an unborn child as a "person" (Colorado) is different from saying they are alive (Missouri).

For example, persons must be have their facial photos taken prior to entrance into certain restricted facilities. This definition would require ultrasounds for pregnant women at security stations, I suppose. (Perhaps a silly example, but it's Saturday morning ante-java. :-)

A more serious problem would be turning loose pregnant criminals, since a "person" cannot be incarcerated when he didn't commit any crime! (I'm assuming, of course, that nobody wants the unborn children torn from the womb, just to lock up the perpetrating mother...)

When the Left tries these types of shenanigans, conservatives rightly point out they are back-door evasions. I wish focus would go into winning hearts and minds and supporting our democratic republic, to encourage The People to change the Constitution.

21 posted on 07/07/2007 5:50:17 AM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

“an unborn child, from the moment of fertilization, is a person.”

An unborn child, from the moment of fertilization, is a person.

An unborn child, from the moment of fertilization, is a person.

An unborn child, from the moment of fertilization, is a person.


22 posted on 07/07/2007 6:01:06 PM PDT by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
For those who believe human life BEGINS at conception, the last 34 years has been a nightmare.

More than 34 years!

Thirty-one percent of all conceptions end in miscarriage, usually in the early months of pregnancy and often before women even know they are pregnant, according to a new study. --The New York Times

Heck, even with the current induced-abortion rate in this country, God is racking up abortions at a much higher rate than human abortionists! Why is God such a wastrel, if he imbues each of zygote with a soul? What's the point of preventing a blastocyst from emplanting, or shedding it off without the mother even knowing about it?

Yes, God lets bad things happen to people, but it doesn't seem to make much sense for God to be killing off so many babies that their mothers don't even know exist! I wonder what happens to all those souls who never got to develop a body beyond a few cells...is the afterlife conciousness tied to our earthly neurological condition? If not, what is the essence of each of us--when our sense of self is so tied into our cognition...? Ah, the "Phineas-Gage puzzles" still are out there!

Truly, a belief in human life beginning at conception can lead to a lot of nightmares!

A right to life amendment to the US Constitution is a necessity.

Agreed. That's the way to go about it...not try some end run on things and screw up our already bloated legal code!

23 posted on 07/07/2007 7:21:50 PM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ViLaLuz; robertpaulsen

His name is Robert Paulson.

His name is Robert Paulson.

His name is Robert Paulson.

His name is Robert Paulson.


24 posted on 07/07/2007 7:34:03 PM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

You certainly made your case. If only in your own mind. LOL

My guess is, you enjoy playing a cynic, or even worse, a misanthropist. Whatever. Its America, its a free country. Carry on.


25 posted on 07/07/2007 8:03:19 PM PDT by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

It was an attempt to point out the church doesn’t/shouldn’t “change with the times”.Public morality goes through swings .


26 posted on 07/08/2007 5:16:20 AM PDT by hoosierham (Waddaya mean Freedom isn't free ?;will you take a creditcard?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson