Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This is absolultely true - My grandson - Airborne Task Force - called the other day more depressed about the liberal rats and the media back here than anything else. He said they (the troops) wish the media would report the truth of what they are doing - especially all the possitive things to help the people there. They feel very betrayed - it is sickening..."the enemy within" - none dare call them traitors? Why not? If you are giving comfort to the enemy = and the media and libs are - you are a traitor
1 posted on 07/06/2007 7:38:18 PM PDT by maine-iac7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: maine-iac7
Have him write a letter to your local paper. The local tie-in is crucial for them to print it.

Also have him point his buddies to:

http://www.appealforcourage.org

2 posted on 07/06/2007 7:41:06 PM PDT by bnelson44 (http://www.appealforcourage.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maine-iac7

I am getting the book as soon as I can.

Nearly every military person I have spoken to who has served over there, including eight young Marines who had each done two tours and an 82nd Airborne Medic who served in Iraq all said the same thing:

They could hardly believe it when they came home and saw how the war is being presented by the media. To a man, they view the media and liberals as entities that are deliberately trying to discredit and drag down what is happening.


3 posted on 07/06/2007 7:46:30 PM PDT by rlmorel (Liberals: If the Truth would help them, they would use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maine-iac7
I believe the conflict in Iraq would be long behind us by now if the old media and the Democratic Party weren’t spreading traitorous sentiment.

They were spreading defeatism since before we entered Afghanistan, saying we could never navigate that mountainous landscape, millions would starve there from our efforts, etc. They said we couldn’t beat the Taliban, too much local support, etc. Then we could never beat Saddam's army, our supply line was stretched too thin to Baghdad (remember the panels of retired generals), the Republican Guard would chew us up in Baghdad, we would never get elections, we would never get a constitution there, etc., etc. They have been cheerleading against us all along, all dour, pompous, arrogant, and shameless after being consistently wrong every step of the way.

In the case of bringing peace to Iraq, our demonstrable resolve is one of our most important weapons. With global media and the nature of this conflict, it is a direct assault on the mission to be campaigning against our cause with this undeserved pessimism. It is one and same with giving hope and encouragement to the enemy. Even the endless story of Bush's low ratings, always attributed solely and specifically to his determination in Iraq, is to tell the enemy that the man leading the fight against them has no support, and that they should hold out at least until 2009 when surely someone of less resolve and focus will be elected, maybe even someone who will immediately withdraw. (If this happens, heaven help us.) I blame the old media and the leaders of the Democratic Party for the ongoing deaths and injuries of our soldiers and innocent Iraqis. And this global war with radical Islam will turn against us if don't correct this course very soon. I know... I'm not alone here.

6 posted on 07/06/2007 8:56:32 PM PDT by FreePoster (Duncan Hunter in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maine-iac7; SoldierDad; Marine_Uncle; Cannoneer No. 4; Cannonette; pissant; 1COUNTER-MORTER-68
“And that was said two years before Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) declared the war lost, or questioned the competence of Marine Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs, and the reliability of Gen. David Petreaus, whom the Senate unanimously confirmed this year to lead the change in strategy in Iraq.

Patterson asks in the book, “What country sends its men and women to war through national decree knowing some will give their all in sacrifice —- yet withers in resolve at the first signs of difficulty and abandons the will to fight? . . .

“What country’s duly elected politicians, often from both sides of the aisle, shamelessly exploit a conflict they voted to authorize and, in doing so, barter the sacrifice of American soldiers for political capital?”

With more votes on Iraq funding coming, it will soon be clear whether those politicians, and others whom Patterson calls “the enemy within,” will further isolate the military —- and in the process lose a war.”

Enough said!

9 posted on 07/06/2007 10:53:26 PM PDT by Chgogal (When you vote Democrat, you vote Al Qaeda! Ari Emanuel, Rahm's brother was agent to Moore's F9/11.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maine-iac7

I have no problem referring to the liberal media elitists and the (lack of) leadership in our government as traitors for all their blustering about our losing this war and other far worse comments over the last five years. If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quack likes a duck, then . . . these liberals are traitors.


10 posted on 07/06/2007 11:00:23 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Father of a 2nd BCT 10th Mountain Soldier fighting the terrorists in the Triangle of Death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson