Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeaHawkFan
>> According to the article posted in #42 above, she published them on a "private website".

> If you put it on the internet, it's not private.

Sorry to say it, but you are simply misinformed. A properly maintained "private" site is just as private as your home, behind a closed and locked door. If you entrust a key to a friend who betrays you, that's unfortunate, but your house is private, not public.

I maintain a number of public and private websites, in addition to some secure business sites. I cannot vouch for the security or procedures of the private portion of the website that this girl's photos were published on, of course, but I have to tell you that -IF- the owners of the site were doing their job, then the only way the photos could become public was an "inside job" -- one of her friends or family leaked them.

47 posted on 07/08/2007 8:48:02 PM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: dayglored

And can you cite some sort of law this person may have broken? He/she may be a jerk, but that doesn’t make him/her a criminal.


49 posted on 07/08/2007 8:59:06 PM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson