[SevenofNine]

Come think of it she still lawyer RIGHT why don’t she testify if she have nothing to hide tesitify

[Anti-Hillary]

What????

[kabar]

It has nothing to do with having something to hide, it has everything to do with the principle of executive privilege and the equality of the three branches of government. Should the WH have the right to subpoena members of Congress and require them to testify about discussions they had with their staff? Remember the Congressional reaction when the DOJ seized papers and computers from Cong. Jefferson’s office?

[BlabItGrabIt]

All your base belong to us?!?!?!?

[TonyInOhio]

Your logic is as clear as your grammar.

[advertising guy]

your broken English is intertaining usually but in this case,it is a sepration of powers thing and Conyers knows it too

[dmz]

Come think of it she still lawyer RIGHT why don’t she testify if she have nothing to hide tesitify

What she said!!

I only wish I knew what she (7/9) said.

[johnny7]

Have a few pops for lunch?

[Stark_GOP]

A good lawyer would know not to let your words be twisted.

[jackibutterfly]

"Come think of it she still lawyer RIGHT why don’t she testify if she have nothing to hide tesitify"

Geeez! Do you read what you type????

[Xenalyte]

Jeez, when did this turn into the Hatin’ on Seven thread? ;)