To: ASA Vet
Wellll... it had a few... erm... setbacks. Pilot error, assuredly. So it’s understandable there were those who doubted it.
5 posted on
07/12/2007 11:59:09 AM PDT by
farlander
(Try not to wear milk bone underwear - it's a dog eat dog financial world)
To: farlander
The first one that went in was because of a computer error, so it wasn’t all pilot error. The second one was pilot error. I knew the pilot on that one, he came from the C130 community. Attempted to land with a little too much sink rate.
To: farlander
Just to play it safe, we must ground and discard any new plane which has had an incident no matter what its cause. It’s the only way to be sure.
15 posted on
07/12/2007 12:16:35 PM PDT by
ASA Vet
(Pray for the deliberately ignorant)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson