Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palfrey called Vitter during House votes
AP via Capital News/C-SPAN ^ | 13 July 07 | CHARLES BABINGTON

Posted on 07/13/2007 1:23:45 AM PDT by leadpenny

Fri Jul 13, 12:14 AM ET

WASHINGTON - A woman accused of running a Washington prostitution ring placed five phone calls to David Vitter while he was a House member, including two while roll call votes were under way, according to telephone and congressional records.

Vitter, a Louisiana Republican now in the Senate, acknowledged Monday that his number was on the woman's call list and apologized for a "very serious sin." The married father of four has remained in seclusion since, missing Senate votes and other activities Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday.

Telephone records released by Deborah Jeane Palfrey indicate she placed calls that were answered by Vitter's Washington phone on five occasions while Vitter was in the House, from 1999 through 2001. On four of those five days, the House was in session and Vitter participated in every roll call vote.

One day was particularly busy in the House, with Vitter's phone receiving Palfrey's call in the middle of the eighth recorded vote of the day, at 5:06 p.m., according to the records.

The records do not indicate whether Vitter himself took the calls or if another person, an answering machine or another answering device picked up the calls.

Federal prosecutors have accused Palfrey of running a prostitution ring beginning in 1993. She says her escort service, Pamela Martin and Associates, was a legitimate business offering sexual fantasies.

Palfrey has said her practice was to promptly return calls placed to her company, to verify the caller's identity and decide whether to arrange an appointment with one of her female employees. All types of researchers are now poring over the thousands of numbers she has released in the hope, Palfrey says, of locating defense witnesses for her case.

Vitter, 46, moved to Washington after winning a special House election in May 1999. His wife and children remained back home, as do many lawmakers' families.

According to the published phone records, the first call placed from Palfrey's phone to Vitter's was at 5:57 p.m. on Oct. 12, 1999, a Tuesday. Vitter participated in three House roll call votes that day, beginning at 7:45 p.m.

On Monday, Sept. 18, 2000, Palfrey called Vitter's phone at 6:36 p.m., records indicate. Vitter joined 376 colleagues at about that time in voting to approve the District of Columbia and United States Territories Circulating Quarter Dollar Program Act. The roll call began at 6:30 p.m., according to House records, and ended at 6:39.

Lawmakers often spend only seconds or minutes to vote in the House chamber and then leave to make calls, check messages or chat with aides or colleagues.

Palfrey's third call to Vitter's phone was placed at 5:06 p.m. on Oct. 26, 2000, a Thursday. Vitter voted in all 10 roll calls that day, starting at midmorning and ending well after dark. Palfrey's phone call came during a 21-minute recorded vote in which Vitter joined most of his GOP colleagues in approving the Small Business Investment Act.

The fourth call was placed at 4:39 p.m. on Feb. 11, 2001, a Sunday. The fifth was placed at 3:06 p.m. on Tuesday, Feb. 27, 2001, more than two hours before Vitter voted in the day's only House roll call. It was Mardi Gras, an especially festive day in New Orleans, which is near Vitter's home town of Metairie.

The calls were first reported by The Times-Picayune of New Orleans.

Vitter, a Harvard graduate and Rhodes scholar, was elected to the Senate in 2004. He faces re-election in 2010.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: Louisiana
KEYWORDS: dcmadam; palfrey; vitter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

1 posted on 07/13/2007 1:23:48 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
The real question is, did he receive oral sex in the oval office, causing him to miss taking out OBL?
2 posted on 07/13/2007 2:02:19 AM PDT by rawcatslyentist (The liberty we prize is not America’s gift to the world, it is God’s gift to humanity.”GWB-03)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rawcatslyentist
Absolutely.

I knew when this paltry Palfrey bitch decided to release the names of her “clients”, that the majority of them would be Republicans. She would, naturally, have to be a Democrat. Republican women aren’t that cheap.

3 posted on 07/13/2007 2:12:16 AM PDT by singfreedom ("Victory at all costs,.......for without victory there is no survival."--Churchill--that's "Winston")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny

Senator Vitter take a deep breath and then say “this too will pass.” It will.


4 posted on 07/13/2007 2:13:10 AM PDT by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rawcatslyentist

The question is what will Vitter and the Louisiana voters do.


5 posted on 07/13/2007 2:14:32 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

He should follow Newt’s and Livingston’s lead.


6 posted on 07/13/2007 2:18:15 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rawcatslyentist

I smell a Comrade Klinton floating around in all the other fecal matter called the Democrat Cesspool election committee.

Liberals are nothing.

Nothing = a turd with all the sh!t scraped off.


7 posted on 07/13/2007 2:53:07 AM PDT by OKIEDOC (Kalifornia, a red state wannabe. I don't take Ex Lax I just read the New York Times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
The records do not indicate whether Vitter himself took the calls or if another person, an answering machine or another answering device picked up the calls.

If they don't know whether Vitter spoke to the woman, then this article is nothing more than a hit piece.

8 posted on 07/13/2007 2:58:29 AM PDT by Cowboy Bob (Withhold Taxes - Starve a Liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
The question is what will Vitter and the Louisiana voters do.

The Louisiana voters elected Edwin Edwards and William Jefferson. What do you think they'll do?

9 posted on 07/13/2007 3:02:08 AM PDT by Cowboy Bob (Withhold Taxes - Starve a Liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob

Then why is he in hiding?


10 posted on 07/13/2007 3:06:05 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob

I don’t know. I’m not from Louisiana. If the reports so far are true, I know what Vitter should do.


11 posted on 07/13/2007 3:07:51 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: OKIEDOC
Nothing = a turd with all the sh!t scraped off.

I like that! Hope you don't mind if I use it.

12 posted on 07/13/2007 3:17:13 AM PDT by dearolddad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
I don’t know. I’m not from Louisiana. If the reports so far are true, I know what Vitter should do.

I spent several years in New Orleans. Believe me, this is "kid stuff" compared to what goes on there.

One thing that strikes me is that the records are from 1999-2000, and nothing since then. Also, phone records usually indicate how long the call was. The length of the call might indicate whether Vitter spoke to Palfrey, or whether Palfrey just got an answering machine.

The people of Louisiana don't seem to care, but the MSM is sure trying to make it into a big scandal.

13 posted on 07/13/2007 3:17:14 AM PDT by Cowboy Bob (Withhold Taxes - Starve a Liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
When Vitter said, "Here, here's my cell phone number," do you suppose a bell went off in his head and a voice, as in an echo chamber, said: "~~~~~~~DON'T GIVE HER YOUR PHONE NUMBER, DAVID~~~~~~~~~"?
14 posted on 07/13/2007 3:27:07 AM PDT by Savage Beast (Ignore the will of the people at your peril, Political "Aristocrats"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast

The voice was in a big empty echo chamber - - his head.
His brains were in another part of his body at the time.


15 posted on 07/13/2007 3:33:33 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob

Yes, if Vitter were cleverer, he would have announced that someone had swiped his cellphone and that he had later found it. (Teddy Kennedy’s hairbrained alabi exonerated him with millions of people.) But if he were smart enought to think of that, he wouldn’t have given her his phone number in the first place. Besides, isn’t there anonymous, casual sex out there for taking if a man’s even slightly resourcefully—I mean circumstances in which the man an remain anonmyous? Of course, there are always “calling cards” that the woman can leave as a reminder, some of which don’t become manifest until a few weeks later.


16 posted on 07/13/2007 3:36:45 AM PDT by Savage Beast (Ignore the will of the people at your peril, Political "Aristocrats"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast

You’d think the guy would be more careful while he was breaking the law.


17 posted on 07/13/2007 3:38:47 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob
Vitter could have claimed that she got his phone number--just how is a big mystery--and that he told her No! He wasn't interested!--even after she called multiple times.

F'cryin'out loud! There are people--mostly women--who think Clinton did not have sex with that woman, Miss Lewinsky--even after he admitted it!

18 posted on 07/13/2007 3:41:18 AM PDT by Savage Beast (Ignore the will of the people at your peril, Political "Aristocrats"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
The question is what will Vitter and the Louisiana voters do.

I can tell you what I'm going to do, and I'm a Louisiana voter. I'm going to vote for David Vitter's re-election in 2010. This entire mess is a recycling of old news from the Drive-By Media. Look for blowback on the Drive-Bys starting next week, particularly Gannett reporter John Hill. He's one of the ringleaders.

19 posted on 07/13/2007 3:45:09 AM PDT by abb (The Dinosaur Media: A One-Way Medium in a Two-Way World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny

He still has our family’s support and I emailed him and told him just that. I recommended that he hunker down and ride this out. A few other choice words about that dim, McHale.


20 posted on 07/13/2007 3:45:37 AM PDT by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson