Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UK hints at foreign policy shift
BBC ^ | 13 July 07

Posted on 07/13/2007 1:41:17 AM PDT by leadpenny

Last Updated: Friday, 13 July 2007, 06:33 GMT 07:33 UK

Douglas Alexander delivered the speech in Washington DC A British Cabinet minister has hinted at a change in the relationship between the UK and US.

Speaking in the US, International Development Secretary Douglas Alexander emphasised the need for "new alliances, based on common values".

He warned against unilateralism and called for an "internationalist approach" to global problems.

Correspondents say the speech appeared to be a "coded criticism" of the policies of President George W Bush.

Mr Alexander's speech came as the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives voted in favour of pulling most combat troops out of Iraq by April next year.

The vote came despite President Bush's threat to veto any timetable for withdrawal.

'Shared solutions'

In his speech at the Council on Foreign Relations in Washington DC, Mr Alexander said isolationism "simply does not work in an interdependent world".

"In the 20th Century a country's might was too often measured in what they could destroy. In the 21st Century strength should be measured by what we can build together," he said.

Our place in the world depends on us making choices based on values - values like opportunity, responsibility, justice

"And so we must form new alliances, based on common values, ones not just to protect us from the world, but ones which reach out to the world.

"There is no security or prosperity at home unless we deal with the global challenges of security, globalisation, climate change, disease and poverty.

"We must recognise these challenges and champion an internationalist approach - seeking shared solutions to the problems we face.

"Multilateralist, not unilateralist means a rules-based international system. Just as we need the rule of law at home to have civilisation so we need rules abroad to ensure global civilisation."

Poverty call

Mr Alexander, who is seen as one of Prime Minister Gordon Brown's closest allies, also said "empowering women must be a priority for us all".

He said: "The economic, social and political position of women in many countries is actively preventing us from reducing child and maternal mortality, and stopping the spread of HIV/Aids."

Mr Alexander said winning support for this approach "is not easy" and work must be done to make them "the accepted norm".

He said: "This means persuading political leaders, indeed community leaders, faith leaders and civic leaders to actively support these principles - whether they are in Europe or the US, China, India or South Africa."

Mr Alexander also called for "core values" of "opportunity, responsibility and justice" to tackle global poverty.

BBC correspondent James Westhead said the speech appeared to suggest that Britain was distancing itself from US President George W Bush.

Our correspondent said: "Some observers have interpreted this as a coded criticism of a president seen by some as high-handed and unilateralist."

But Mr Alexander stressed to the BBC that Gordon Brown had already spoken to the president and was committed to a strong and effective dialogue.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: gordonbrown

1 posted on 07/13/2007 1:41:19 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
Any policy shift away from combat in Iraq and the general march towards Tehran will be construed as a sign of weakness on the part of the British by the Jihadists.

And the usual reaction to perceived weakness will rain down upon them.

Let's just hope that this is just part of the usual deception via the BBC.

Not that President Bush hasn't squandered his credibility on defending the nation by attempting to dissolve our borders, but the battle against Islamic terror is still quite serious.

2 posted on 07/13/2007 1:56:06 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob

I was hoping there were still other folks that felt that way.


3 posted on 07/13/2007 2:04:36 AM PDT by singfreedom ("Victory at all costs,.......for without victory there is no survival."--Churchill--that's "Winston")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
"We must recognise these challenges and champion an internationalist approach - seeking shared solutions to the problems we face.

"Multilateralist, not unilateralist means a rules-based international system. Just as we need the rule of law at home to have civilisation so we need rules abroad to ensure global civilisation."

Australian Foreign Affairs Minister, Alexander Downer: "multilateralism is a synonym for an ineffective and unfocused policy involving internationalism of the lowest common denominator"

4 posted on 07/13/2007 2:38:58 AM PDT by Dundee (They gave up all their tomorrows for our today's.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny

Lemmie see, now.

In reference to Iraq, that is.

Just who’s doing the “building”, and who’s doing the “Destroying”?

Just asking.


5 posted on 07/13/2007 3:47:47 AM PDT by Flintlock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dundee
Just as we need the rule of law at home to have civilisation so we need rules abroad to ensure global civilisation."

The problem with this, as recent history has shown, is that once said rules are in place, the "international community" expects only the U.S. to play by them, giving terrorist government and outright dictatorships a free pass. No thanks! I think Uncle Sam should stick with unilateralism in world affairs and do whatever is necessary to win, Europe and Asia be damned.

6 posted on 07/13/2007 3:50:22 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner ("Si vis pacem para bellum")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

Britain is on the verge of committing national suicide.


7 posted on 07/13/2007 4:21:31 AM PDT by brigadoon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob

The TORRIES had better step up and save Britania!

LLS


8 posted on 07/13/2007 4:37:16 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny

Not sure how this represents a change of policy really, there’s nothing in the reported words on the face of it that Tony Blair didn’t say at some point.


9 posted on 07/13/2007 8:54:44 AM PDT by JHT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson