Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin
According to Byron York of the National Review, the Republican Party base has simply decided to throw Mr. Bush under the wheels of the bus.

Gallagher couldn't be more wrong.

Conservatives got tired of defending Bush and then having the White House not join the defense OR come out against his own defenders.

And then there are policy difference with McCain-Feingold and Illegal Amnesty. Those are huge disagreements with his base, and he's chosen to fight them over it, and they fought back.

Abandon the President? He's not abandoned. He's supported on points of agreement and not supported on points of disagreement.

10 posted on 07/13/2007 5:24:24 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: xzins
Gallagher couldn't be more wrong.

Conservatives got tired of defending Bush and then having the White House not join the defense OR come out against his own defenders.

And then there are policy difference with McCain-Feingold and Illegal Amnesty. Those are huge disagreements with his base, and he's chosen to fight them over it, and they fought back.

Abandon the President? He's not abandoned. He's supported on points of agreement and not supported on points of disagreement.

Dittos.

15 posted on 07/13/2007 5:27:40 AM PDT by Lurking in Kansas (Nothing witty here...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

Gallegher is so wrong on this; FIRST of all, Byron York did not say conservatives should throw Bush under a bus. All York said was the same things here: That Bush has abandoned the GOP base on many things and has failed to act like a conservative, so therefore, conservatives are naturally going to look elsewhere.


53 posted on 07/13/2007 5:58:50 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
Abandon the President? He's not abandoned. He's supported on points of agreement and not supported on points of disagreement.

Hear here! Well said!

When the president acts in accordance with the law, as any president should, he is supported. When he fails to "...take care that the laws be faithfully executed..." (Article II Section 3 United States Constitution) or signs legislation into law that he believes to be, at least partially, unconstitutional - a gross violation of his oath of office - he is NOT supported nor should he be.

116 posted on 07/13/2007 6:31:34 AM PDT by Bigun (IRS sucks @getridof it.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: xzins; All

I couldn’t be more disappointed in your self-serving analysis . . . I also don’t know how you maintained a straight face when you typed that “. . . (At FR) the President is supported on points of agreement” . . . Did you happen to read most of the posts on this thread.

REALITY CHECK:

OVER 70% OF REPUBLICANS SUPPORT PRESIDENT BUSH (even the new, just released today, AP/IPSOS REID PRO-DEMOCRAT poll verifies this level of support) which makes the position of the majority posting on this thread the EXCEPTION rather than the rule!


408 posted on 07/13/2007 4:52:34 PM PDT by DrDeb (IF STANDING FOR LIBERTY IN THE WORLD MAKES ME A DISSIDENT, I WEAR THAT TITLE WITH PRIDE. GWB -07)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson